VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, ensuring that certain costs like water rates and council tax are excluded while others like service charges are included. This decision affects tenants and landlords in similar situations.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent determination under an assured periodic tenancy.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination excludes certain factors such as the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant, increases in value due to improvements made by the tenant, and decreases in value due to the tenant's non-compliance with the tenancy terms.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, excluding water rates and council tax but including service charges. The decision took effect on 31 May 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AU/MNR/2023/0224

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 7A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord [COMPANY] [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1445.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 31 May 2023

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 13th September 2017

6. Length of the term or rental period Periodic Tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Bed and sofa

9. Description of premises A converted ground floor one bedroom flat forming part of a Victorian building containing 3 flats with communal garden.

[NAME] of Decision 8TH August 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant was entitled to a rent determination under an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The Tribunal determined the rent to be £1445.00 per calendar month.
  • The decision on the rent determination took effect on 31 May 2023.
  • The tenancy was an assured periodic tenancy that commenced on 13th September 2017.
  • The flat was a converted ground floor one-bedroom flat in a Victorian building with a communal garden.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, setting the rent to include service charges but exclude water rates and council tax.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about what should be included in the rent was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be set according to the same criteria.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and relevant legislation were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It's recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.