VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the weekly rent at £242.33, excluding some costs like water rates and council tax.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed according to the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.

Topics

rent assessmentassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent they pay. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous tribunal decision or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £242.33 per week, excluding water rates and council tax but including service charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BG/MNR/2021/0018

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [COMPANY], 4 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 242.33 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 5 October 2020

*3. The amount included for services is

negligible

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 29 February 2016

6. Length of the term or rental period Weekly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord, but tenant must use in a tenant-like manner and redecorate internally

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises First floor flat in a modern purpose built block. 2 bedrooms, living room, bathroom /WC. Full CH. No outside space.

[NAME] of Decision 18 June 2021

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent to be £242.33 per week.
  • The decision on the rent assessment takes effect from 5 October 2020.
  • The amount included for services in the rent is considered negligible.
  • The landlord is responsible for repairs, with the tenant required to use the property tenant-like and redecorate internally.
  • The premises are described as a first-floor flat with two bedrooms, a living room, and a bathroom/WC.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the weekly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £242.33.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which provides guidelines for setting rents.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about the appropriate rent level under the Housing Act was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for guidance on rent assessment.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence regarding the property and relevant financial data were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can often be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.