VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Assessment for Assured Periodic Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The rent was set at £1,662.50 per month, effective from 12 September 2020, following the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed according to the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.

Topics

rent assessmentassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988 Section 14, a tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988 Section 14. The rent was set at £1,662.50 per month, effective from 12 September 2020.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AC/MNR/2020/0108

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 40 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [NAME] First floor, [NAME], 35 - 37 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1,662.50 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 12 September 2020

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable n/a Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced Held on tenancy since 1956

6. Length of the term or rental period monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord No information provided but assumed all furniture is owned by tenant

9. Description of premises A semi detached two storey house with 3 bedrooms, lounge, dining room and bathroom/WC. There is a rear garden and off street parking.

[NAME] of Decision 3rd March 2021

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed according to the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.
  • Rent determinations are based on the open market value, adjusted for relevant factors such as improvements and anti-social behavior.
  • Rent adjustments take into account the property's condition and improvements made with landlord consent.
  • Courts consistently rule in favor of tenants seeking rent assessments under the specified act sections.
  • Tenants are entitled to a fair rent determination process under the Housing Act 1988.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £1,662.50 per month, effective from 12 September 2020.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which provides the framework for assessing rents for assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent for the assured periodic tenancy.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for guidance on rent assessment for assured periodic tenancies.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the tenancy agreement and the relevant statutory provisions.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.