Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy by considering the open market value and making adjustments based on the condition of the property and local issues such as anti-social behavior.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determination based on the open market value, adjusted for relevant factors such as improvements and anti-social behavior.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar tenancy. However, applications cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the open market value, adjusting for certain factors.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the open market value, adjusting for improvements and local issues. The decision took into account the condition of the property and the impact of anti-social behavior in the area.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/MNR/2019/0109
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 68 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 45 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1270.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 October 2019
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 22 January 2004
6. Length of the term or rental period Periodic Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs S.11 Landlord & Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises Purpose built 3rd floor flat comprising two rooms, kitchen and bathroom/WC with central heating and communal gardens and car parking
[NAME]
Date of Decision 1st November 2019
1
Case Reference : KA/LON/OOBK/MNR/2019/0109
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 19 August 2019
Type of Application : Determination of the market rent under Section 14 Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME]
Mr [NAME] and venue of : 29 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
_______________________________________________
DECISION
____________________________________
The Tribunal determines the rent payable from 1st October 2019 is £1270.00 per month.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2014 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background
1. The tenant referred to the Tribunal a notice of rent increase served by the landlord under section 13 of The Housing Act 1988. The landlord’s Notice which proposed a rent of £745 per month with effect from 1st October 2019 is dated 29th July 2019. A letter accompanying the Notice set out the various methods which had been used in capping the rent one of which was set at 60% of the open market rental value. The letter also stated that the effective date for the increase was 22nd September 2019 rather than the date shown on the Notice.
2. The tenancy is a periodic tenancy which commenced in January 2014.
3. A hearing was held at which the tenants of Flat 68 and Flat 9 Thomson House appeared and presented a joint case. The landlord was not present or represented at the hearing and the Tribunal received written representation from the tenant. No written representations were received from the landlord.
The hearing
4. [APPELLANT], tenant of Flat 9 Thomson House and Miss [APPELLANT] both presented their own arguments in relation to their property. A representative from the [NAME] also made a submission to the Tribunal at the hearing.
5. Miss [APPELLANT] relied upon her written representations as a guide for her submission to the Tribunal. She commented on the general condition of the building and the environment, the problems the residents had experienced with the external letter box and identity theft, water penetrating the chute room, restricted fire brigade access to Thomson House, excessive leaves in the garden and parking area, inadequate lighting in common areas, removal and replacement of flat doors, infestation of mice and moss and a problem with the servicing of the lift in her block.
6. She also explained that at the date of the hearing that she had not had any central heating for some time. She told the Tribunal gas boiler maintenance staff had carried out an inspection prior to the hearing and a remedy was being explored.
7. She made representation about the market rent and argued that rents for lettings comparable to her property range from £300-£350 per week. She provided a listing of properties which she claimed were comparable to the subject.
8. No representation was received from the landlord.
3
Inspection
9. The Tribunal inspected the property on 1st November 2019. The premises are situated in a purpose built block built in approximately 1980 within a gated estate of flats and houses with communal gardens, children’s playground and carparking facilities. Flat 68 is on the third floor overlooking the communal gardens and we understand the layout of all the flats in the block is identical.
10. The flats are centrally heated and double-glazed and comprise a living room with bay window providing good natural light, louvre door to the kitchen with fitted units and a gas fired central heating boiler in a cupboard, a double bedroom with fitted wardrobes, bathroom/WC with wash basin and a vanity, large wall mirror and tiled walls. There are two large storage cupboards accessed off the hallway.
11. There is no natural light in either the kitchen or bathroom.
12. We were told the white goods, carpets, carpets and blinds are provided by the tenant.
13. The common parts were clean, carpeted and heated by radiators.
14. Each individual section of the block was served by a passenger lift. There was a rubbish chute that served each floor.
15. The gardens were well maintained.
The law
16. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of The Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal proceeded to determine the rental which it considers that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
17. The Tribunal must first determine that the tenants notice under section 13(4) satisfied the requirements of that section and was validly served.
18. The Housing Act 1988, section 14 requires the Tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
19. In so doing the Tribunal, are required by section 14(1), to ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act.
4
20. A copy of the relevant legislation is at Appendix A.
Valuation
21. The Tribunal had regard to the comparable transaction rental evidence supplied by the tenant, together with the Tribunal’s own knowledge and experience of rental levels in and around the locality of the property. On this basis, it was their opinion that if the flat were in the same condition as those available to let on the open market the rental value would be £1,450 per month.
22. The property, whilst relatively recently built, exhibits some dilapidation and obsolescence. A deduction of 10% was made from market rent to reflect the benefit of the tenant’s carpets, curtains, white goods and soft furnishings.
23. The representations made to the Tribunal included a number of matters material to the rent achievable for this property. The Tribunal gave particular weight to the impact of the recent anti-social behaviour in the locality. A reduction of 2.5% was made from market rent to reflect the anti-social behaviour in the locality and other relevant rental valuation matters.
24. The Tribunal are cognisant of the defective central heating system at the date of the hearing and inspection. They acknowledge the inconvenience and distress this can cause but it was not considered a material rental valuation consideration due to the short term nature of the disrepair.
25. After careful consideration, the Tribunal determined that a monthly rent of £1,270.00 per month is appropriate for this dwelling in present condition. Table 1 below provides further details on the deductions made from market rent in this calculation.
Table 1: Market Rental Assessment
5
Decision
26. The Tribunal first determined that the tenant’s notice under section 13(2) satisfied the requirements of that section and was served in time.
27. In coming to its decision on the rent the Tribunal applied the relevant law appended at Annex A.
28. The decision of this Tribunal is based upon the evidence provided at the hearing, written submissions and the inspection.
29. The Tribunal disregarded the benefit of tenants’ improvements or household effects supplied with landlord’s consent in assessment of the Market Rent in accordance with the provisions of the Housing Act.
30. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the rent at which this property in present condition, with disregarded tenants’ improvements and subject to an assured periodic tenancy might reasonably be expected to achieve on the open market is £1,270.00 per month.
31. This rent will take effect from 1 October 2019.
Valuer Chairman: [NAME]: 6 December 2019
6
Appendix A Housing Act 1988
14 Determination of rent by rent assessment committee. (1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In deciding under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely—
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, always during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.
7
(4) In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition and Improvemen…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Lower Market Rent for Unmodernised Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Assessment for Assured Periodic Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Rejects Rent Increase Due to Poor Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a rent determination based on the property's actual condition.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent reduction if the property is unmodernized.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under an assured periodic tenancy.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent assessment that includes disrepair and defects.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent determination under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the open market value, adjusted for certain factors.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the open market value, adjusting for improvements and local issues.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument about the impact of anti-social behavior in the area was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and local issues when arguing for a rent adjustment.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence about the condition of the property and local issues was important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor.
