VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal sets £1350/month rent for assured tenancy in Sheffield

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £1350.00, effective from 20 August 2019. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, specifically setting the rent at £1350.00 per month.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then decide on the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The application cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1350.00, effective from 20 August 2019.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The decision took effect on 20 August 2019, setting the monthly rent at £1350.00 excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts specified in the judgment.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CG/MNR/2019/0061

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Sheffield, [POSTCODE]

Mr C [NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 299 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1350.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 20 August 2019

3. The amount included for services is not applicable 0.00 Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 20 May 2012

5. Length of the term or rental period Calendar Month

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord: Repairable structural failures and make good any damage arising out of such failures and boiler. Tenant: Non-structural repairs and internal decoration

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Fully furnished bungalow.

8. Description of premises Three bedroomed, detached bungalow with conservatory, double garage and gardens. The demise did not include the basement rooms and areas.

Judge Mr C [NAME] of Decision 27 November 2019

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the new rent to be £1350.00 per calendar month.
  • The decision on the new rent took effect on August 20, 2019.
  • The landlord is responsible for structural repairs and the boiler.
  • The tenant is responsible for non-structural repairs and internal decoration.
  • The property is a three-bedroom, detached bungalow with a conservatory, double garage, and gardens.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £1350.00 per month.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the amount of rent for an assured periodic tenancy in Sheffield.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £1350.00 per month, following the provisions of the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14 to determine the rent for the assured periodic tenancy.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a determination of their rent under the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.