Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: £115.00 Per Week
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on the rent for a poorly maintained property at £115.00 per week, taking into account the property's condition and similar properties in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent assessment based on the property's condition and comparables in the area.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for a poorly maintained property at £115.00 per week.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for a poorly maintained property at £115.00 per week, considering the property's condition and comparables in the area.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/MNR/2019/0004
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 36 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] 33 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £115.00 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 4 February 2019
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 11 October 1993
6. Length of the term or rental period weekly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs s11 Landlord & Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none
9. Description of premises Two story mid-terraced house
[NAME] of Decision 14 March 2019
1
Case Reference : BIR/00CN/MNR/2019/0004
Property
: 36 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : Appeal against a notice proposing a new rent under an
Assured Periodic Tenancy under section 13(4) of the Housing
Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME].[NAME]. [NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS
Mr [NAME]. [NAME] and Venue of : Not Applicable, paper determination Hearing
Date of Decision : 4 April 2019
____________________________________________________________
DECISION
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2019
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
1 The rent is determined at £115.00 (One Hundred and Fifteen Pounds) per week from 4 February 2019.
REASONS
Introduction
2 The tenant, [NAME] [APPELLANT], holds a monthly assured tenancy of 36 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE], that he has held since 11 October 1993.
3 On 21 December 2018 the landlord served notice of increase under section 13(2) of The Housing Act 1988 proposing a rent of £170.00 per week to take effect on 4 February 2019. Neither the previous nor proposed rents included any amounts for Council Tax, water rates or fixed service charges.
4 On 25 January 2019 the tenant applied for the rent to be determined by the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber.
5 On 14 March 2019 the Tribunal inspected the property and determined the rent at £115.00 per week with effect from 4 February 2019.
6 On 29 March 2019 the Tribunal received a request for Reasons from the landlord.
The Law 7 Section 14 of The Housing Act 1988 states:
'(1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy -
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to
which the notice relates;
(b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice;
(c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as
those of the tenancy to which the notice relates;...'
'(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded -
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant;
(b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant
improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the
tenant, if the improvement-
(i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to the
immediate landlord ...
8 The jurisdiction of the Rent Assessment Committee was transferred to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) from 1st July 2013.
3
Facts Found
9 The Tribunal inspected the property on 14 March 2019. The landlord attended at the property but was not allowed access by the tenant.
10 The property comprises a compact, traditional inner terrace Victorian house located on the eastern fringe of Moseley not far from the A34 [ADDRESS]. The surrounding area is mainly terraced housing similar in age and character. It is within walking distance of local shops, schools and bus routes to the city centre which is about three miles to the north.
11 The accommodation comprises a hall, two receptions rooms, kitchen, lobby and bathroom on the ground floor with a landing, two bedrooms and box room accessed through the back bedroom on the first floor. The property is set back from the pavement and has a small enclosed yard to the rear. There is no room for any off road parking but there is street parking on the road frontage.
12 The house is two storey brick and slate construction with a two storey brick and slate wing and single storey brick and slate wing to the rear, containing the bathroom.
13 There are radiators in the two reception rooms, hall and back bedroom but no heating in the front bedroom or box room. There is double glazing. The accommodation is in basic condition, for example, the kitchen walls are unplastered painted brick, there are minimal kitchen cupboards, the back bedroom ceiling is uneven, the electrical conduit is surface mounted and the bathroom suite dated. Externally, there is flashband over the front bay where the roof joins the front elevation of the house, the fences to both sides of the yard are dilapidated and the slab paving is uneven. The house needs investment to bring it to current standards.
Submissions
14 Neither party requested a Hearing. The tenant sent written submissions but the landlord sent no submissions. The case was determined on paper after consideration of the documents before the Tribunal.
15 The Applicant's Submission
The Applicant's case can be summarised as follows:
1 there has been a history of dispute between the landlord and tenant;
2 the front door is difficult to open due to damp ingress caused by a leaking gutter;
3 the front door step allows damp ingress to the hall;
4 the back door needs repair;
5 the central heating system is faulty;
6 the double glazing is incorrectly fitted with draughts around window frames;
7 the kitchen units are falling apart;
8 the kitchen overflow pipe has also fallen apart.
9 the following comparable evidence was referred to:
i) [ADDRESS]., Sparkhill, [POSTCODE]
Details were provided of a two bedroom inner terraced house with gas fired
central heating and double glazing, available to let for £550 pcm (£126.92 per
week)
4
ii) [ADDRESS]., Tyseley, B11
A two bedroom inner terraced house with central heating and double glazing,
available to let for £550 pcm (£126.92 per week)
iii) [ADDRESS]., Sparkhill
A two bedroom inner terraced house available to let for £550 pcm (£126.92 per
week) described as 'newly decorated throughout'.
iv) [ADDRESS]., B13
A two bedroom flat advertised at £525 pcm (£121.15 per week).
v) [ADDRESS]., B13 (No particulars submitted)
A two bedroom flat advertised at £475 pcm (£109.61 per week).
vi) [ADDRESS]., B11 (No particulars submitted)
A three bedroom flat advertised at £425 pcm (£98.07 per week).
16 The Respondent's Submission
None.
Decision
17 The house is in basic condition. It has part central heating but the general standard is poor and below that expected by tenants in the present market. It would let but at a price. In good condition, refurbished, it ought to let for £125 per week on the terms of the tenancy but the Tribunal finds that in present condition its rental value is £115.00 per week.
18 The Tribunal therefore determine the rent in accordance with section 14 of The Housing Act 1988 to be £115.00 (One Hundred and Fifteen pounds) per week with effect from 4 February 2019.
[NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS Chairman
Appeal
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision an application may be made to this Tribunal for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal, Property Chamber (Residential Property) on a point of law only. Any such application must be received within 28 days after the decision and accompanying reasons have been sent to the parties (Rule 52 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £800 for Semi-Detached House
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Victorian House in Moseley
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Set at £575 Per Month for Semi-Detached House in Willenhall
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Shared Room Including Bills
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Short-term Tenancy Rent at £1,500
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Poorly Maintained Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy in Birmingham
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rental Value at £775 Monthly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's basic condition and poor general standard reduced its rental value.
- The house needed investment to meet current standards, affecting its rent.
- The kitchen walls were unplastered painted brick, indicating a basic condition.
- The back bedroom ceiling was uneven, and the electrical conduit was surface mounted.
- The bathroom suite was dated, contributing to the property's overall poor standard.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed rent of £170.00 per week was not accepted by the Tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent for a poorly maintained property was set at £115.00 per week.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the rent determination process.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and compared it to similar properties in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its comparability to similar properties.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure their property is well-maintained and provide comparables when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition and comparable rental prices in the area were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, an appeal can be made to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law only.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
