Rent Reduced for Tenant Due to Property's Damp and Mold Issues
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the rent for a tenant because the property had significant damp and mold problems. The Tribunal relied on a condition report provided by the landlord to make their decision.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a reduced rent if the property's condition is unsatisfactory.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal reduced the rent due to the poor condition of the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined that the rent should be reduced to £60.06 per week due to the property's poor condition, including damp and mold issues, as shown in a condition report provided by the landlord.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AF/MNR/2023/0115
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 136 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Judge Shepherd [COMPANY] 6, 6 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 60.06 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 3rd December 2023
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable £10.06 Per week
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 13th January 1992
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Per s.11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord n/a
9. Description of premises Ground floor two bedroom flat with lounge, kitchen bathroom and WC.
Chairman Judge Shepherd Date of Decision 24th November 2023
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/OOAF/MNR/2023/0015 Property :
136 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Landlord : [COMPANY] : No attendance Tenant : [COUNSEL] : No attendance Type of application : Determination of rent under s.14 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal : Judge Shepherd Kevin Ridgeway MRICS Date of Directions : 6th December 2023
DETERMINATION
The property 1. This property is a ground floor flat with two bedrooms, lounge, kitchen, bathroom and separate WC. The property was not inspected as the tenant
was away at the date of the hearing and access was not provided. However, there was available to the Tribunal a condition report prepared for the landlord with numerous photographs. These showed the property to be riddled with damp and mould. The surveyor’s conclusion was that: “The remedial work can only be carried out without the resident in occupation.” And “The estimated duration of the works is [90 days] following a lead in period of 4 weeks.”
The law 2. Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 sets out how rent should be increased by a landlord of an assured periodic tenant. For the purpose of securing an increase in the rent under a tenancy to which this section applies, the landlord may serve on the tenant a notice in the prescribed form proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy specified in the notice.
3. Section 14 deals with determination of rent by the Tribunal when there has been a reference. The Tribunal determine the rent at which, subject to qualifications they consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
4. The qualifications are that the Tribunal will disregard (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement—(i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
Determination
5. It is the view of the Tribunal that no rental increase could be justified for this property in light of its appalling condition. The Tribunal’s decision is that the rent should be reduced to £60.06 per week with the amount for services of £10.06 included in the rent.
Judge Shepherd 6th December 2023
RIGHTS OF APPEAL 1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-Tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
3. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent Based on Market Comparables
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Social Housing Property Based on Market R…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set at £250 Weekly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Lower Market Rent for Unmodernised Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Split-Level Flat in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Rejects Landlord's Request for Increased Rent Due to Property's Co…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property was in an appalling condition, which justified a rent reduction.
- The property was severely affected by damp and mould, as shown in a condition report.
- Remedial work on the property could only be carried out if the resident was not living there.
- The estimated duration of the necessary works was 90 days, plus a four-week lead-in period.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent was reduced to £60.06 per week due to the property's poor condition.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition, which was assessed using a condition report provided by the landlord.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property, which was deemed unsuitable for living due to damp and mold issues.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to reduce their rent if the property's condition is unsatisfactory.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The condition report provided by the landlord was crucial in determining the property's condition.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
