VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy by considering comparable properties and the condition of the property. The decision was made on November 24, 2023.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant may reasonably expect a dwelling-house to be let at a certain rent in the open market under an assured tenancy.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent determinationproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the dwelling-house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy. This determination considers the periods of the tenancy, the terms of the tenancy except for the rent amount, and any notices given under Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to the Act.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable properties and the condition of the property.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable properties and the condition of the property. The decision took effect on 24 November 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AL/MNR/2023/0135

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 333 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge Shepherd Kevin Ridgeway MRICS

Landlord R [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1600 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 24 November 2023

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable N/A Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 4th April 2006

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Per s.11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord n/a

9. Description of premises 3 bedroom house with living room , 2 bathrooms, lounge, garage and garden.

Chairman Judge Shepherd Date of Decision 24th November 2023

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/OOAL/MNR/2023/0135 Property :

333 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Landlord : Dr [COUNSEL] : In Person Tenant : [COUNSEL] : In Person Type of application : Determination of rent under s.14 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal : Judge Shepherd Kevin Ridgeway MRICS Date of Directions : 6th December 2023

DETERMINATION

The property 1. The property is a three storey, end terrace town house in Thamesmead. The accommodation is comprised of three bedrooms, two reception rooms, two

bathrooms, garage and garden. Both parties attended the hearing on 24 November 2023. The Tribunal inspected the property after the hearing.

The law 2. Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 sets out how rent should be increased by a landlord of an assured periodic tenant. For the purpose of securing an increase in the rent under a tenancy to which this section applies, the landlord may serve on the tenant a notice in the prescribed form proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy specified in the notice.

3. Section 14 deals with determination of rent by the Tribunal when there has been a reference. The Tribunal determine the rent at which, subject to qualifications they consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.

4. The qualifications are that the Tribunal will disregard (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement—(i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

Determination

5. The landlord put forward a number of comparable properties, which she considered adequately supported the proposed rental increase. The tenant doubted the relevance of these comparables and described the lack of repair undertaken by the landlord and the improvements she had made. The landlord stated that she has been denied access to the property which justified the lack of repair response.

6. The property was in reasonable condition though the applicant showed the Tribunal areas that required attention. Taking into account the comparable evidence and the comments made by both parties, it is the Tribunal’s opinion that a rent of £1,600 per month should be set. The Applicant had made a case for undue hardship, which was accepted by the Tribunal, so accordingly the date the decision takes effect is 24 November 2023.

Judge Shepherd 6th December 2023

RIGHTS OF APPEAL 1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-Tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.

3. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal accepted the tenant's claim of undue hardship, which influenced the decision's effective date.
  • The Tribunal considered the landlord's comparable properties when setting the new rent.
  • The Tribunal found the property to be in reasonable condition, despite some areas needing attention.
  • The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,600 per month for the property.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's claim of being denied access to the property as justification for lack of repair was not explicitly accepted as a reason for the property's condition.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £1,600 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered comparable properties and the condition of the property to determine the rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The arguments regarding the condition of the property and the comparability of other rents were crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and comparable rents when disputing rent increases.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the property's condition and comparable rents were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.