Tenant's Appeal for Market Rent Rejected by First-tier Tribunal
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that they do not have the power to set a market rent for a tenant's fixed-term tenancy agreement. The case was decided remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is not entitled to have their rent set according to market rates under S.14 of the Housing Act 1988 during the fixed term of their tenancy.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies, to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, applications are restricted if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to set a market rent under S.14 of the Housing Act 1988 for a fixed-term tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to determine the market rent under S.14 of the Housing Act 1988 for a fixed-term tenancy agreement. The decision was made on the basis that S.14 only applies to periodic and statutory periodic tenancies, not fixed-term agreements.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AY/MNR/2020/0091 HMCTS CODE ; Paper Property : 35a [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]. Applicant : [redacted] : In person. Respondent : [redacted] Representative : In person. Type of application : Decision in relation to jurisdiction under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) : [NAME], FRICS, Date of decision : 7 May 2021.
DECISION
Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote determination on the papers. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, and all issues could be determined on the papers. Decision: The Tribunal determines that it does not have jurisdiction to determine the market rent under S.14 of the Housing Act 1988 in relation to this application, for the reasons stated below. Background:
1. The tenant, Ms [APPELLANT] entered into a five-year fixed term tenancy agreement on 10 December 2018.
2. The landlord served a Notice of Increase under S.13 of the Act on the tenant on or around 17 February 2020 purporting to increase the rent from £197.94 per week to £203.28 per week with effect from 6 April 2020.
3. The tenant referred that Notice to the tribunal together with other documents.
4. On 16 April 2021 the tribunal informed the parties that it’s preliminary view was that it did not have jurisdiction to determine the rent, because S.13 of the Housing Act 1988 only applies to periodic and statutory periodic tenancies. The subject tenancy is still within the five-year fixed term, and the rent increase notice served was not required, because the increase is a contractual one within the tenancy agreement.
5. In the circumstances the tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine the rent. It is also worth noting for the parties that the tribunal’s jurisdiction extends to setting ‘market rents’ that is the full rent that a property would achieve if let on the open market. In this tribunal’s experience, Housing Associations do not charge full market rents and had this matter been decided under S.13, it is likely that the rent would have exceeded that within the Notice of Increase.
6. The application is therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Name: [NAME] [NAME]: 7 May 2021.
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.
If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
THE LAW:
S.13 The Housing Act 1988. – Increases of rent under assured periodic tenancies: 13(1); This section applies to – (a) A statutory periodic tenancy other than one which, by virtue of paragraph 11 or paragraph 12 in Part I of Schedule 1 to this Act, cannot for the time being be an assured tenancy; and (b) Any other periodic tenancy which is an assured tenancy, other than one in relation to which there is a provision, for the time being binding on the tenant, under which the rent for a particular period of the tenancy will or may be greater than the rent for an earlier period. 13(2) For the purpose of securing an increase in the rent under a tenancy to which this section applies, the landlord may serve on the tenant a notice in the prescribed form proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy6 specified in the notice, being a period beginning not earlier than – (a) The minimum period after the date of the service of the notice; and (b) Except in the case of a statutory periodic tenancy – a. In the case of an assured agricultural occupancy, the first anniversary of the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; b. In any other case, on the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; and c. If the rent under the tenancy has previously been increased by virtue of a notice under this subsection or a determination under S.14 i. In the case of an assured agricultural occupancy, the first anniversary of the date on which the increased rent took effect; ii. In any other case, the appropriate date. (3) the minimum period referred to in subsection (2) above is; (a) in the case of a yearly tenancy, six months; (b) in the case of tenancy is less than a month, one month, and (c) in any other case, a period equal to the period of the tenancy. (4) In this section ‘rent’ does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 but, subject to that, includes any
sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection 1(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling house concerned, or are payable under separate agreements. S.14 Determination of rent by the tribunal: (1) Where under subsection (4)(a) of Section 13, a tenant refers to the appropriate tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the appropriate tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to section (2) and (4) above, the appropriate tribunal consider that the dwelling house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy – (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notices relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of the grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to the Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded – (a) any effect on the cost attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant. If the improvement – (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement, and (c)any reduction in the value of the dwelling house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Water Ingress Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Dispensation from Consultation Requirem…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Boiler Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Challenge Against Invalid Notice of Rent Increase
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Approves Enfranchisement Application
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Entitled to Recover Reasonable Costs Under Lease Provisions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Local Authority Secures Annual Site License Fee Order Against Non-compliant…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord is entitled to dispensation from consultation requirements if the works are urgent and necessary.
- A tenant can challenge a notice of rent increase if it contains incorrect figures.
- A claimant can recover reasonable costs under the lease provisions if successful in a claim.
- A local authority is entitled to an order for payment of an annual site license fee under the relevant act.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- A tenant is not entitled to have their rent set according to market rates under the specified act during the fixed term of their tenancy.
- A claimant cannot recover costs incurred by a party to proceedings from a firm outside the tribunal's jurisdiction under the rule.
- A tenant cannot refer a Section 13 notice to the Tribunal after the proposed new rent takes effect.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided it does not have the authority to set a market rent for a fixed-term tenancy agreement.
Who was involved?
The case involved a tenant and a landlord, both representing themselves in the proceedings.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the Housing Act 1988 does not allow the setting of market rents for fixed-term tenancies, as it only applies to periodic and statutory periodic tenancies.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the tenancy agreement was still within its fixed term, and thus the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to set a market rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should understand that the First-tier Tribunal cannot set market rents for fixed-term tenancies under the Housing Act 1988.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The tenancy agreement and the notice of rent increase were the key documents considered by the Tribunal.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving complex legal issues.
