VadeLab
DismissedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tenant's Application for Rent Determination Rejected by First-tier Tribunal

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided against the tenant's request to lower their rent under section 22 of the Housing Act 1988. The tribunal found that the current rent was reasonable and not significantly higher than what the landlord might expect to get.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a determination of the rent under section 22 of the Housing Act 1988 if the rent is significantly higher than what the landlord might reasonably expect to obtain under the tenancy.

Topics

tenancy agreementsrent determinationsremote hearings

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.22

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 22 allows a tenant under an assured shorthold tenancy to apply to an appropriate tribunal for a determination of the rent if the rent is significantly higher than what the landlord might reasonably expect to obtain under the tenancy. The tribunal will consider whether there are enough similar properties in the area and whether the rent in question is notably higher than these.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal determined that the rent was not significantly higher than what the landlord might reasonably expect to obtain under the tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) rejected the tenant's application for determination of a rent under section 22 of the Housing Act 1988, finding that the rent was not significantly higher than what the landlord might reasonably expect to obtain under the tenancy.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BK/MDR/2021/0014 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) : P:PAPERREMOTE Property : 104 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : In Person Respondent: [redacted] : In Person Type of application : Market Rent under s22 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) :

[NAME]

Date and venue of hearing : 28 July 2021 at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 28 July 2021

DECISION

2 Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote hearing which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined on paper. The documents that I was referred to are the tenancy agreement, the application and covering correspondence from the parties the contents of which the tribunal have noted Decisions of the tribunal (1) Pursuant to section 22(3)(a) the tribunal determines that there is a sufficient number of similar properties in the locality let on assured tenancies. (2) Pursuant to section 22(3)(b) the tribunal determines that the rent under the assured shorthold tenancy in question is not significantly higher than the rent which the landlord might reasonably be expected to obtain under the tenancy. (3) The tribunal makes the determinations as set out under the various headings in this decision. The application 1. The applicant seeks a determination pursuant to section 22 of the Housing Act 1988 following the grant of a tenancy for a term of 2 years from and including 3 February 2021 at commencing rent of £295 per week. Background 2. By a tenancy agreement made on 28 January 2021 the landlord let the subject property to the tenant.

3. On 12 May 2021 the Tenant applied to the tribunal for determination of a rent under section 22 of the Housing Act 1988.

4. The tribunal has received no rental evidence from either party.

5. An inspection was not possible on this occasion and the tribunal relied on the correspondence and its knowledge and experience. The property 6. [ADDRESS] is a well-located block with good access to public transport. The block provides a high standard of services including lift access and a concierge.

3 7. The flat is a 1 bedroom flat providing reasonably spacious accommodation located on the 6th floor.

8. The tenants reply form complains of disrepair at the property and the lack of heating in the bathroom.

9. Correspondence from the landlord indicates that he has tried to arrange repairs but access has been denied by the tenant.

10. It is not the function of this tribunal to resolve this issue. The Law 11. Under section 22(2)(aa) an application to the tribunal must be made within 6 months of the commencement of the tenancy. The tribunal is satisfied the application was made in time.

12. Under section 22(3) the tribunal must then determine that there is a sufficient number of similar properties in the locality let on assured tenancies and secondly that the rent payable under the assured shorthold tenancy in question is significantly higher than the landlord might reasonably expected to obtain under the tenancy.

13. The Housing Act 1988, section 22 requires the tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy. Valuation 14. No rental evidence had been put forward by either party.

15. The tribunal used its own knowledge and experience. The tribunal is of the view that the rent agreed is not significantly higher than the rent which the landlord might reasonably be expected to obtain under the tenancy. The tribunal therefore has no jurisdiction to make a determination of the rent.

Name: [NAME] Valuer Chair Date: 28 July 2021

4

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Housing Act 1988 22 Reference of excessive rents to [F1appropriate tribunal].

(1)Subject to section 23 and subsection (2) below, the tenant under an assured shorthold tenancy F2. . . may make an application in the prescribed form to [F3the appropriate tribunal] for a determination of the rent which, in [F4the appropriate tribunal’s] opinion, the landlord might reasonably be expected to obtain under the assured shorthold tenancy. (2)No application may be made under this section if— (a)the rent payable under the tenancy is a rent previously determined under this section; F5. . .

5 [F6(aa)the tenancy is one to which section 19A above applies and more than six months have elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy or, in the case of a replacement tenancy, since the beginning of the original tenancy; or] (b)the tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy falling within subsection (4) of section 20 above (and, accordingly, is one in respect of which notice need not have been served as mentioned in subsection (2) of that section). (3)Where an application is made to [F7the appropriate tribunal] under subsection (1) above with respect to the rent under an assured shorthold tenancy, [F8the appropriate tribunal] shall not make such a determination as is referred to in that subsection unless they consider— (b)that the rent payable under the assured shorthold tenancy in question is significantly higher than the rent which the landlord might reasonably be expected to be able to obtain under the tenancy, having regard to the level of rents payable under the tenancies referred to in paragraph (a) above. (4)Where, on an application under this section, [F9the appropriate tribunal] make a determination of a rent for an assured shorthold tenancy— (a)the determination shall have effect from such date as [F10the appropriate tribunal] may direct, not being earlier than the date of the application; (b)if, at any time on or after the determination takes effect, the rent which, apart from this paragraph, would be payable under the tenancy exceeds the rent so determined, the excess shall be irrecoverable from the tenant; and (c)no notice may be served under section 13(2) above with respect to a tenancy of the dwelling-house in question until after the first anniversary of the date on which the determination takes effect. (5)Subsections (4), (5) and (8) of section 14 above apply in relation to a determination of rent under this section as they apply in relation to a determination under that section and, accordingly, where subsection (5) of that section applies, any reference in subsection (4)(b) above to rent is a reference to rent exclusive of the amount attributable to rates. [F11(5A)Where—

(a)an assured tenancy ceases to be an assured shorthold tenancy by virtue of falling within paragraph 2 of Schedule 2A to this Act, and (b)at the time when it so ceases to be an assured shorthold tenancy there is pending before [F12the appropriate tribunal] an application in relation to it under this section,

6 the fact that it so ceases to be an assured shorthold tenancy shall, in relation to that application, be disregarded for the purposes of this section.] [F13(6)In subsection (2)(aa) above, the references to the original tenancy and to a replacement tenancy shall be construed in accordance with subsections (6) and (7) respectively of section 21 above.]

Textual Amendments

F1Words in s. 22 substituted (1.7.2013) by The Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013 (S.I. 2013/1036), art. 1, Sch. 1 para. 86(a) (with Sch.

3) F2Words in s. 22(1) repealed (28.2.1997) by 1996 c. 52, ss. 104, 227, Sch. 8 para. 2(5), Sch. 19 Pt. IV; S.I. 1997/225, art. 2 (with Sch.) F3Words in s. 22(1) substituted (1.7.2013) by The Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013 (S.I. 2013/1036), art. 1, Sch. 1 para. 86(b)(i) (with Sch.

3) F4Words in s. 22(1) substituted (1.7.2013) by The Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013 (S.I. 2013/1036), art. 1, Sch. 1 para. 86(b)(ii) (with Sch.

3) F5Word in s. 22(2)(a) repealed (28.2.1997) by 1996 c. 52, s. 227, Sch. 19 Pt. IV; S.I. 1997/225, art. 2 F6S. 22(2)(aa) inserted (28.2.1997) by 1996 c. 52, s. 100(2); S.I. 1997/225, art. 2 (with Sch.) F7Words in s. 22(3) substituted (1.7.2013) by The Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013 (S.I. 2013/1036), art. 1, Sch. 1 para. 86(c)(i) (with Sch.

3) F8Words in s. 22(3) substituted (1.7.2013) by The Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013 (S.I. 2013/1036), art. 1, Sch. 1 para. 86(c)(ii) (with Sch.

3) F9Words in s. 22(4) substituted (1.7.2013) by The Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013 (S.I. 2013/1036), art. 1, Sch. 1 para. 86(d)(i) (with Sch.

3) F10Words in s. 22(4) substituted (1.7.2013) by The Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013 (S.I. 2013/1036), art. 1, Sch. 1 para. 86(d)(ii) (with Sch.

3) F11S. 22(5A) inserted (28.2.1997) by 1996 c. 52, s. 104, Sch. 8 para. 2(6); S.I. 1997/225, art. 2 (with Sch.) F12Words in s. 22(5A)(b) substituted (1.7.2013) by The Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013 (S.I. 2013/1036), art. 1, Sch. 1 para. 86(e) (with Sch.

3) F13S. 22(6) inserted (28.2.1997) by 1996 c. 52, s. 100(3); S.I. 1997/225, art. 2 (with Sch.)

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined there are enough similar properties in the area let on assured tenancies.
  • The application for rent determination was made within the required six-month timeframe.
  • The tribunal found the agreed rent was not significantly higher than what the landlord could reasonably expect.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal decided against the tenant's request to lower the rent under section 22 of the Housing Act 1988.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided against the tenant because the rent was not significantly higher than what the landlord might reasonably expect to obtain under the tenancy.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 22 of the Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was whether the rent was significantly higher than what the landlord might reasonably expect to obtain under the tenancy.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure they provide sufficient evidence to support their claim for rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence showing that the rent was not significantly higher than what the landlord might reasonably expect to obtain under the tenancy was crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations under the Housing Act 1988.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.