VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent for Damaged Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the fair rent for a property suffering from extensive dampness and mould. They reduced the rent from the market rate to reflect the poor condition of the property.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjusted for the condition of the property.

Topics

fair rentproperty condition

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property suffering from dampness and mould, adjusting the market rent accordingly.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property suffering from extensive dampness and mould, adjusting the market rent accordingly. The decision was made after considering the property's condition and the lack of amenities.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BJ/F77/2024/0056

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [COMPANY])

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £252.02 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 17 May 2024

3. The amount for services is 10.52 Per week

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ .................................................................................................................................................................... per .................................. including £ ...................... per ................................ for services (variable).

(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ ......... per ................... including £ ......................................... per ................................ for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 17 May 2024

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 383

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 254.2

X 383 Minus Y 254.2 = (A) 128.8

(A) 128.8 Divided by Y 254.2 = (B) 0.50669

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.55669

Last registered rent* 159.00 Multiplied by (C) = 247.51 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 248.00

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services 10.52

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £258.52 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the

variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Case Reference

: LON/00BJ/F77/2024/0056

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Ms [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [COMPANY])

Date of Objection : 10 December 2023

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME]

Mrs [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 17 May 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £252.02 per week (variable) will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 17 May 2024, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection

2. The Tribunal has carried out an inspection of the property on 17 May 2024. The flat is a large lower ground floor flat resulting from the lateral conversion of two adjoining houses. The flat suffers from extensive dampness and mould which is reflected in the S70 rent below.

Evidence

3. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant. There were no written submissions from the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation

4. In the absence of rental comparables provided by the parties the tribunal has relied on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect/ its current condition would be in the region of £700.00 per week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

Extensive rising and penetrating dampness and mould growth No carpets curtains or white goods

5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

Fair rent pw Market rent 700.00 £ less condition 35% 245.00 -£ 455.00 £ less services 10.52 £ net rent 444.48 £ less scarcity 20% 88.90 £ 355.58 £ add back services 10.52 £ Fair rent 366.10 £

7. The Tribunal determines a s70 rent of £366.10 (variable) per week.

Decision

8. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £366.10 per week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £258.52 per week (variable). The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of £258.52 per week (variable) is to be registered as the fair rent or this property.

Chairman: [NAME]: 17 May 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property's fair rent was determined to be £252.02 per week.
  • The Tribunal inspected the property, noting extensive dampness and mould.
  • The Tribunal considered the tenant's written submissions.
  • The Tribunal used its own expert knowledge of rental values to determine the open market rent.
  • Adjustments were made to the market rent due to extensive dampness and mould growth.
  • Adjustments were made because the property lacked carpets, curtains, or white goods.
  • An adjustment for scarcity was applied to the net rent.
  • The capped rent, calculated at £258.52 per week, was registered as the fair rent because it was lower.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property with extensive dampness and mould.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to adjust the fair rent downwards due to the property's poor condition.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property, particularly the dampness and mould.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, who objected to the initial fair rent determination.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may be able to negotiate a fair rent that reflects the condition of their property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence of the property's condition, including dampness and mould, was crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate legal channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.