Tribunal Appoints Property Manager Due to Management Failures
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided to appoint a person as the manager of a property because of management failures. The decision was made to improve the management of the property and ensure better governance of client monies.
⚖️ Legal holding
A Tribunal may appoint a manager to manage premises if there are management failures and it is just and convenient to do so.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a tribunal can appoint a manager to handle the management of certain premises when there are breaches of obligations related to management, unreasonable service charges, or other significant management issues. The tribunal must also be convinced that it is fair and practical to make such an appointment considering all the circumstances.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal appointed a manager for a property based on management failures and the need for better governance.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal appointed Mr Green as the manager of a property after reviewing his qualifications and experience. The decision was based on management failures and the need for better governance of client monies.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL [APPELLANT] CHAMBER ([APPELLANT]) Case reference : LON/00AC/LAM/2022/0025 [APPELLANT] : 108a & [ADDRESS], London, [[APPELLANT]] Applicants : [redacted] : Mr [COUNSEL] of Counsel Respondents : [redacted] : Mr [COUNSEL], Solicitor Type of application : Appointment of a manager Tribunal members : Tribunal Judge I [NAME] of hearing : 5 June 2023
Date of decision : 13 July 2023
DECISION
2
Introduction
1. This is an application made by the Applicants under section 24 of the Landlord and Tenant Act (as amended) (“the Act”) for an order in respect of 108a & [ADDRESS], London, [[APPELLANT]] (“the [APPELLANT]”).
2. The [APPELLANT] is described as a semi-detached house converted into two maisonettes. The Applicants are the lessees of [ADDRESS]. The Respondents are the joint freeholders of the [APPELLANT].
3. The various management failures complained of by the Applicants are set out in the witness statement of the Second Applicant, Mrs [RESPONDENT] dated 24 February 2023. For reasons that will become apparent, it is not necessary to set these out. The Law 4. Section 24 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 provides:
"(1) A leasehold valuation tribunal may, on an application for an order under this section, by order appoint a manager to carry out, in relation to any premises to which this Part applies-
(a) such functions in connection with the management of the
premises, or
(b) such functions of a receiver,
or both, as the Tribunal thinks fit.
(2) A leasehold valuation tribunal may only make an order under this section in the following circumstances, namely-
(a) where the tribunal is satisfied-
(i) that any relevant person either is in breach of any
obligation owed by him to the tenant under his tenancy
and relating to the management of the premises in
question or any part of them...
(ii) ...
(iii) that it is just and convenient to make the order in all the
circumstances of the case;
(ab) where the tribunal is satisfied-
(i) that unreasonable service charges have been made, or
are proposed or likely to be made; and
(ii) that it is just and convenient to make the order in all the
circumstances of the case;
(aba)...
(abb)...
3
(ac) where the tribunal is satisfied-
(i) where any relevant person has failed to comply with any
relevant provision of a code of practice approved by the
Secretary of State under section 87 of the Leasehold
Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993
(codes of management practice), and
circumstances of the case;
(b) where the tribunal is satisfied that other circumstances exist which make it just and convenient for the order to be made.
Hearing 5. The hearing took place on 5 June 2023. The Applicants were represented by Mr [COUNSEL] of Counsel. The Respondents were represented by Mr [COUNSEL], a Solicitor.
6. The Respondents had not filed or served any evidence in the case. When this was raised with Mr [NAME], he said that that they were consenting to the appointment of the Applicant’s proposed manager, [NAME].
7. Therefore, the only issue before the Tribunal was whether [NAME] possessed the relevant knowledge and experience to be appointed as the manager of the [APPELLANT].
8. This was set out in two witness statements prepared by him together with a draft Management Plan for the [APPELLANT].
9. In addition, the Tribunal conducted its own examination of Mr [APPELLANT] in relation to this [APPELLANT] management experience.
10. Mr [APPELLANT] told Tribunal he had no formal training or qualification in [APPELLANT] management. His interest in [APPELLANT] management started in or around 2011 when he took on the management of his own [APPELLANT] portfolio and those of some family members. It was in 2018 that he accepted third party [APPELLANT] instructions to manage residential [APPELLANT]. [NAME] now manages some 102 units over some 15 sites, one site has 62 flats and the remaining sites between 2-4 flats.
11. Almost all the leasehold properties he manages hold a share of the freehold. He has no experience of managing blocks of flats with freeholder interest.
12. The services offered to his clients varies. At the 62 flat block he is not responsible for the issue of service charge demands, at the other properties his company carries out a full management role. The company does not operate a client account for either annual or reserve service charges. He told Tribunal that all his 40 or so clients operate
4 [APPELLANT] specific service charge accounts and he uses these accounts to deposit monies and make payments. 13. After review of the witness statements and hearing evidence the Tribunal had a number of reservations about Mr [APPELLANT] intention to act as Manager of the [APPELLANT]. These include:
- The lack of any formal [APPELLANT] management training and qualification;
- limited knowledge and experience of residential management and in particular the requirements of the [NAME] Service Charge Residential Management Code; and
- no established governance for client monies within his company and specifically, no business client account. His company is not Regulated by the [NAME] or ARMA.
14. The [APPELLANT] comprises two dwellings with no common areas. This type of [APPELLANT] should present a straightforward management situation that demands practical management skills with a reliance upon consultants for professional expertise. Mr [NAME] responses to Tribunal questions revealed knowledge of the statutory [APPELLANT] management requirements including those relevant to section 20 consultation. The Tribunal concluded Mr [NAME] has acquired many of the necessary skills and knowledge from his exposure to the procedures adopted by other managing agents since 2011. They would encourage him to improve his knowledge of the [NAME] guidance and adopt this unequivocally in his [APPELLANT] management of this [APPELLANT].
15. The Tribunal was also concerned at the lack of governance of client monies. It was not clear from his submission whether Mr [NAME] was authorised to make payments to contractors at the various properties he managed or his role in accounting for receipts and expenditure.
16. Mr [NAME] confirmed to the Tribunal that it is his intention to open a client monies bank account. The Tribunal endorsed this proposed action. They also recommend a further bank account is opened for the deposit of reserve account monies. This is to ensure compliance with the [NAME] code.
17. The Tribunal is cognisant of the fact that [NAME] is not a member of the [NAME] and, therefore, will not be subject to formal financial scrutiny and external supervision. The Tribunal intend to apply a condition that a Chartered Accountant must inspect the client accounts every six months to ensure compliance with [NAME] standards. After each satisfactory review, the auditors shall issue a certificate of satisfactory compliance, which would be attached to the six monthly reports to Tribunal.
5 18. The Tribunal is aware of the short comings of Mr [NAME] in terms of his experience, formal training and business governance but recognise few managing agents are interested in managing a two dwelling block [APPELLANT]. He has practical experience of [APPELLANT] management. He exhibits a commitment to address the concerns held by the Tribunal. The additional conditions and supervision proposed will further support Mr [NAME] and enhance governance.
19. After careful consideration the tribunal is persuaded to approve his appointment as Manager of the [APPELLANT]. The management order is annexed to this decision.
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) ([APPELLANT] Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the [APPELLANT] and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]).
6
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
[APPELLANT] CHAMBER [APPELLANT])
Case reference : LON/00AC/LAM/2022/0025 [APPELLANT] : 108a & [ADDRESS], London, [APPELLANT]
Applicants : [redacted]
Respondents : [redacted]
Tribunal members : Tribunal Judge I [NAME] of hearing : 5 June 2023 Date of Order : 13 July 2023
MANAGEMENT ORDER
Interpretation
1. In this Order:
“The [APPELLANT]” means the premises known as known as 108A and [ADDRESS], London [[APPELLANT]] and registered at HM Land Registry under title number MX242805 and shall include the building, outhouses, gardens, amenity space, drives, pathways landscaped areas, flower beds, passages, bin stores, common parts, storage rooms basements, electricity and power rooms; and all other parts of the [APPELLANT].
7 “The Landlord” shall mean [APPELLANT] and [RESPONDENT] or their successors in title to the reversion immediately expectant upon the Leases.
“The Tenants" shall mean the proprietors for the time being of the Leases whether as lessee or under-lessee and "Tenant” shall be construed accordingly.
“The Leases" shall mean all leases and/or underleases of flats in the [APPELLANT].
“The Manager” means Mr [APPELLANT]
“The Tribunal” means the First-tier Tribunal ([APPELLANT] Chamber)
ORDER
2. In accordance with section 24(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act
1987 (“the Act”) Mr [APPELLANT] is appointed as Manager of the
[APPELLANT].
3. The Manager’s appointment shall start on 14 days from the date
of this order (“the start date”) and shall end on two years
thereafter (“the end date”).
4. For the avoidance of doubt this Order supplements but does not
displace covenants under the Leases and the Tenants remain
bound by them. Where there is a conflict between the provisions
of the Order and the Leases, the provisions of the Order take
precedence.
5. The purpose of this Management Order is to provide for the
management of the [APPELLANT] which includes taking steps to
resolve the following problems of inadequate management
identified by the tribunal:
a. The issues identified in the report of [NAME]
dated 1 March 2021 (“the Report”)
6. To address the steps identified in the previous paragraph the
Manager is empowered to:
a. Collect monies in order to prepare and carry out a
programme of works to remedy all of the issues identified
in the Report.
7. The Manager shall manage the [APPELLANT] in accordance with:
a. the terms of this Order and the Directions set out below;
8 b. the respective obligations of the Landlord and the
Tenants under the Leases whereby the [APPELLANT] is
demised by the Landlord (save where modified by this
Order); c. the duties of a Manager set out in the Service Charge
Residential Management Code (“the Code”) (3rd Edition)
or such other replacement code published by the [NAME] (“[NAME]”) and approved
by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 87 Leasehold
Reform Housing and Urban Development Act
1993(whether the Manager is a Member of the [NAME] or
not; and d. the provisions of sections 18 to 30 of the Landlord and
Tenant Act 1985.
8. From the date this Order comes into effect, no other party shall
be entitled to exercise a management function in respect of the
[APPELLANT] where the same is the responsibility of the Manager
under this Order.
9. The tribunal requires the Manager to act fairly and impartially in
the performance of their functions under this Order and with the
skill, care and diligence to be reasonably expected of a Manager
experienced in carrying out work of a similar scope and
complexity to that required for the performance of the said
functions.
10. The Manager or any other interested person may apply to vary
or discharge this Order pursuant to the provisions of section
24(9) of the Act.
11. Any application to extend or renew this Order must be made
before the end date, preferably at least three months before that
date, and supported by a brief report of the management of the
[APPELLANT] during the period of the appointment. Where an
application for an extension or renewal is made prior to the end
date, then the Manager’s appointment will continue until that
application has been finally determined.
12. The Manager is appointed to take all decisions about the
management of the [APPELLANT] necessary to achieve the purposes
of this Order. If the Manager is unable to decide what course to
take, the Manager may apply to the Tribunal for further
directions, in accordance with section 24(4), Landlord and
Tenant Act 1987. Circumstances in which a request for such
directions may be appropriate include, but are not limited to:
9 a. a serious or persistent failure by any party to comply with
an obligation imposed by this Order; b. circumstances where there are insufficient sums held by
the Manager to discharge their obligations under this
Order and/or for the parties to pay the Manager’s
remuneration; and c. where the Manager is in doubt as to the proper
construction and meaning of this Order.
Contracts
13. Rights and liabilities arising under contracts, including any
contract of insurance and/or any contract for the provision of
any services to the [APPELLANT], to which the Manager is not a party,
but which are relevant to the management of the [APPELLANT], shall
upon the date of appointment become rights and liabilities of the
Manager, save that:
a. the Landlord shall indemnify the Manager for any
liabilities arising before commencement of this Order;
and b. the Manager has the right to decide, in their absolute
discretion, the contracts in respect of which they will
assume such rights and liabilities, with such decision to
be communicated in writing to the relevant parties within
56 days from the date this order.
14. The Manager may place, supervise and administer contracts and
check demands for payment of goods, services and equipment
supplied for the benefit of the [APPELLANT].
15. The Manager shall be responsible for responding to pre-contract
enquiries regarding the sale of a residential flat at the [APPELLANT].
Legal Proceedings
16. The Manager may bring or defend any court or tribunal
proceedings relating to management of the [APPELLANT] (whether
contractual or tortious) and, subject to the approval of the
Tribunal, may continue to bring or defend proceedings relating
to the appointment , after the end of their appointment.
17. Such entitlement includes bringing proceedings in respect of
arrears of service charge attributable to any of the Flats in the
[APPELLANT], including, where appropriate, proceedings before this
tribunal under section 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
and in respect of administration charges under schedule 11 of
the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 or under
section 168(4) of that Act or before the courts and shall further
10
include any appeal against any decision made in any such
proceedings.
18. The Manager may instruct solicitors, counsel, and other
professionals in seeking to bring or defend legal proceedings and
is entitled to be reimbursed from the service charge account in
respect of costs, disbursements or VAT reasonably incurred in
doing so during, or after, this appointment. If costs paid from
the service charge are subsequently recovered from another
party, those costs must be refunded to the service charge
account.
Remuneration
19. The Landlord is solely liable for payment of the Manager’s fees.
However, should the Landlord fail to make payment of any fees
within 28 days of a first class postage of a written demand by the
Manager to the Landlord’s registered address, then the Manager
may obtain payment for those fees
a. from the Tenants by way of a 50% contribution in respect
of each of the two leases of the [APPELLANT] (payable within
28 days of the first class postage of a written demand by
the Manager to the address for the tenant in the relevant
Land Registry entry)
and/or
b. A contribution of greater than 50% from the Applicants if
they elect to pay more.
20. Any of the Tenants may apply to the Tribunal for an order that
the Landlord reimburse them for any fees that they have paid to
the Manager under the preceding paragraph, together with their
costs of obtaining that reimbursement.
21. The sums payable are:
a. an annual fee of £2,000, to be increased on the
anniversary of appointment in line with the [NAME];
b. where in any month there are building works at the
[APPELLANT] involving builders being on-site for more than
half of that month, an additional fee of £83 for that
month;
11 c. where it is necessary to undertake consultation under
section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, a fee of
£450, unless the consultation process includes a
requirement for notification of the award of the contract,
in which case the fee shall instead be £550;
d. a reasonable fee for any attendance at Tribunal or Court;
e. postage costs and other minor incidental costs.
Ground Rent and Service charge
22. The Manager shall not collect the ground rents payable under
the residential Leases.
23. The Manager shall collect all service charges and insurance
premium contributions payable under the Leases, in accordance
with the terms and mechanisms in the Leases.
24. Whether or not the terms of any Lease so provides, the Manager
shall have the authority to:
a. demand payments in advance and balancing payments at
the end of the accounting year; b. establish a [NAME] to meet the Landlord’s
obligations under the Leases; c. allocate credits of service charge due to Tenants at the
end of the accounting year to the [NAME]; d. alter the accounting year and to collect arrears of service
charge and insurance that have accrued before their
appointment; and
25. The Manager may set, demand and collect a reasonable service
charge to be paid by the Landlord (as if he were a lessee), in
respect of any unused premises in part of the [APPELLANT] retained
by the Landlord, or let on terms, which do not require the
payment of a service charge.
26. To ensure that the Manager has adequate funds to manage the
[APPELLANT], the Manager may immediately collect £ 500 from each
Tenant and, as the case may be, any reasonable sum
from the Landlord. Any sum demanded by the Manager shall be
payable within 28 days.
27. The Manager is entitled to recover through the service charge
the reasonable cost and fees of any surveyors, architects,
solicitors, counsel, and other professional persons or firms,
12
incurred by them whilst carrying out their functions under the
Order.
Administration Charges
28. The Manager may recover administration charges from
individual Tenants for their costs incurred in collecting ground
rent, service charges and insurance which includes the costs of
reminder letters, transfer of files to solicitors and letters before
action. Such charges will be subject to legal requirements as set
out in schedule 11 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform
Act 2002. The Details of the fees charged are set out in the
Appendix of additional fees.
Disputes
29. In the event of a dispute regarding the payability of any sum
payable under this Order by the lessees, additional to those
under the Leases (including as to the remuneration payable to
the Manager and litigation costs incurred by the Manager), a
Tenant, or the Manager, may apply to the tribunal seeking a
determination under section 27A of the Landlord and Tenant
Act 1985 as to whether the sum in dispute is payable and, if so,
in what amount.
30. In the event of a dispute regarding the payability of any sum
payable under this Order by the landlord, other than a payment
under a Lease, the Manager or the Landlord may apply to the
tribunal seeking a determination as to whether the sum in
dispute is payable and, if so, in what amount.
31. In the event of dispute regarding the conduct of the
management of the [APPELLANT] by the Manager, any person
interested may apply to the Tribunal to vary or discharge the
order in accordance with section 24(9) of the Landlord and
Tenant Act 1987.
32. In the event of a dispute regarding the reimbursement of
unexpended monies at the end of the Manager’s appointment,
the Manager, a Tenant, or the Landlord may apply to the
Tribunal for a determination as to what monies, if any, are
payable, to whom, and in what amount.
DIRECTIONS TO LANDLORD
33. The Landlord must comply with the terms of this Order.
13 34. On any disposition of the Landlord’s estate in the [APPELLANT], the
Landlord will procure from the person to whom the [APPELLANT] is
to be conveyed, a direct covenant with the Manager, that the said
person will (a) comply with the terms of this Order; and (b) on
any future disposition (other than a charge) procure a direct
covenant in the same terms from the person to whom the
[APPELLANT] is to be conveyed.
35. The Landlord shall give all reasonable assistance and co-
operation to the Manager in pursuance of their functions, rights,
duties and powers under this Order, and shall not interfere or
attempt to interfere with the exercise of any of the Manager’s
said rights, duties or powers except by due process of law.
36. The Landlord is to allow the Manager and their employees and
agents access to all parts of the [APPELLANT] and must provide keys,
passwords, and any other documents or information necessary
for the practical management of the [APPELLANT] in order that the
Manager might conveniently perform their functions and duties,
and exercise their powers under this Order.
37. Within 14 days from the date of this Order the Landlord must
provide all necessary information to the Manager to provide for
an orderly transfer of responsibilities, to include the transfer of:
a. all accounts, books and records relating to the [APPELLANT],
including a complete record of all unpaid service charges;
and b. all funds relating to the [APPELLANT] including uncommitted
service charges and any monies standing to the credit of a
reserve or [NAME].
DIRECTION TO CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR
38. To protect the direction in paragraph 34 for procurement by the
Landlord, of a direct covenant with the Manager, the Registrar is
ordered to enter the following restriction in the register of the
Landlord’s estate under title no MX242805. The restriction is to
have overriding priority against any search with priority or
pending application for a disposition of the registered estate
(other than a charge) that has been lodged after the 30th day of
November 2022
“No disposition of the registered estate (other than a charge) by the
proprietor of the registered estate, or by the proprietor of any
registered charge, not being a charge registered before the entry of this
restriction, is to be completed by registration without a certificate
signed by the applicant for registration or their conveyancer that the
14
provisions of paragraph 34 of an Order of the Tribunal dated 13 July
2023 have been complied with”
DIRECTIONS TO MANAGER
39. The Manager must adhere to the terms of the Order above.
Registration
40. The Manager must make an application to HM Land Registry for
entry of the restriction referred to in paragraph 38, within 14
days of the date of this Order.
Conflicts of Interest
41. The Manager must be astute to avoid any Conflict of Interest
between their duties and obligations under this Order, and their
contractual dealings. Where in doubt, the Manager should apply
to the Tribunal for directions.
Complaints
42. The Manager must operate a complaints procedure in
accordance with, or substantially similar to, the requirements of
the [NAME].
Insurance
43. The Manager must maintain appropriate building insurance for
the [APPELLANT] and ensure that the Manager’s interest is noted on
the insurance policy.
44. From the date of appointment, and throughout the appointment,
the Manager must ensure that he/she has appropriate
professional indemnity insurance cover in the sum of at least £1
million and shall provide copies of the certificate of liability
insurance to the Tribunal, and, upon request, to any Tenant or
the Landlord. The Certificate should specifically state that it
applies to the duties of a Tribunal appointed Manager.
Accounts
45. The Manager must:
a. prepare and submit to the Landlord and the Tenants an
annual statement of account detailing all monies
receivable, received and expended. The accounts are to be
15
certified by the external auditor, if required under the
Leases; b. maintain efficient records and books of account and to
produce for these for inspection, to include receipts or
other evidence of expenditure, upon request by the
Landlord or a Tenant under section 22 Landlord and
Tenant Act 1985; c. maintain on trust in an interest-bearing account at such
bank or building society, as the Manager shall from time
to time decide, into which ground rent, service charge
contributions, Insurance Rent, and all other monies
arising under the Leases shall be paid; and d. hold all monies collected in accordance with the
provisions of the Code.
Repairs and maintenance
46. The Manager must:
a. by 28 days after this order draw up a planned
maintenance programme for the period of the
appointment, allowing for the periodic re-decoration and
repair of the exterior and interior common parts of the
[APPELLANT], as well as any roads, accessways, mechanical,
electrical and other installations serving the [APPELLANT], and
shall send a copy to every Tenant and to the
Landlord; b. subject to receiving sufficient prior funds:
i. carry out all required repair and maintenance required
at the [APPELLANT], in accordance with the Landlord’s
covenants in the Leases, including instructing contractors
to attend and rectify problems, and is entitled to recover
the cost of doing so as service charge payable under the
Leases or in accordance with the Order. ii. arrange and
supervise any required major works to the [APPELLANT],
including preparing a specification of works and
obtaining competitive tenders. c. liaise with all relevant statutory bodies in the carrying out
of their management functions under the Order; and d. ensure that the Landlord, and the Tenants, are consulted
on any planned and major works to the [APPELLANT] and to
give proper regard to their views.
47. The Manager has the power to incur expenditure in respect of
health and safety equipment reasonably required to comply with
regulatory and statutory requirements.
16 Reporting
48. By no later than six months from the date of appointment (and
then annually) the Manager must prepare and submit a brief
written report to the Tenants, and the Landlord, on the progress
of the management of the [APPELLANT] up to that date, providing a
copy to the Tribunal at the same time.
49. The Manager must confirm in his initial report to Tribunal no
later than 6 months from date of appointment, that he has set up
a client bank account for this [APPELLANT] and include with his
report a copy of a reconciliation statement from the appointed
independent Chartered Accountant. All subsequent 6 monthly
reports must include the client account reconciliation with a
brief verification report from the independent Chartered
Accountant.
End of Appointment
49. No later than 56 days before the end date, the Manager must:
a. apply to the tribunal for directions as to the disposal of
any unexpended monies; b. include with that application a brief written report on the
progress and outcome of the management of the [APPELLANT]
up to that date (a “Final Report”); and c. seek a direction from the tribunal as to the mechanism for
determining any unresolved disputes arising from the
Manager’s term of appointment (whether through court
or tribunal proceedings or otherwise).
50. Unless the tribunal directs otherwise the Manager must within
two months of the end date: a. prepare final closing accounts and send copies of the
accounts and the Final Report to the Landlord and
Tenants, who may raise queries on them within 14 days;
and b. answer any such queries within a further 14 days.
51. The Manager must reimburse any unexpended monies to the
paying parties, or, if it be the case, to any new Tribunal
appointed Manager within three months of the end date or, in
the case of a dispute, as decided by the Tribunal upon an
application by any interested party.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Order for Property Management Due to Failures
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Appoints Property Manager to Resolve Management Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Appoints Manager to Oversee Property Management
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Appoints New Manager for Poorly Managed Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Awarded Fair Premium for New Lease and Costs Against Unreasonable Re…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Lighting Works Without Consultatio…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Lease Extension Premium
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Extends Manager's Appointment for Two Years
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Appoints Property Manager Due to Communication Breakdow…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules on Service Charges Payability
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Appoints Property Manager to Address Sub-standard Condi…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The respondents consented to the appointment of the proposed manager.
- The property is a two-dwelling block, which is often difficult to find managing agents for.
- The proposed manager has practical experience in property management.
- The proposed manager showed commitment to addressing the Tribunal's concerns.
- The Tribunal will impose conditions and supervision to support the manager and improve governance.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided to appoint Mr Green as the manager of a property.
Who was involved?
The tenants and the freeholders of the property were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to appoint Mr Green because of management failures and the need for better governance of client monies.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 s.24 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the need for better governance of client monies and resolving management failures.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might consider bringing a case to the Tribunal if they face management failures and need better governance.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Witness statements and a draft Management Plan for the property were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
