VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal confirms £640/month rent for assured tenancy in Carlisle

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £640, effective from June 25, 2023. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under the Housing Act 1988, section 14, considering the specific circumstances of the tenancy, such as the property's condition and location in Carlisle.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £640 per month, effective from June 2023.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The decision took effect on 25 June 2023, setting the monthly rent excluding water rates and council tax but including other specified amounts.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/16UD/MNR/2023/0233

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 52 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

Landlord C/o [COMPANY] 55-57 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT] & Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 640.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 25 June 2023

3. Date assured tenancy commenced Thought to b3e in November 2001.

4. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

5. Allocation of liability for repairs As per Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1095

6. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

7. Description of premises A semi-detached house, built approximately 30 years ago on an estate on the outskirts of Carlisle, with a vestibule containing a wc and basin, a large lounge, and a kitchen/dining room downstairs, and 4 bedrooms (one small) and a bathroom, with a shower over the bath, wc and basin, upstairs. Outside is a small open front garden, a drive to the side of the house, and a small and constricted garden to the rear.

[NAME] of Decision 18 April 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant requests a rent determination under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant invokes Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 for rent determination.
  • Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 is applicable to the tenant's request.
  • The court recognizes the tenant's right to have their rent determined under Section 14.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £640.00, effective from 25 June 2023.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about determining the rent for an assured periodic tenancy in Carlisle.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £640.00 per month, effective from June 25, 2023, based on the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14 to determine the rent for the assured periodic tenancy.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, as the rent was set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be determined according to the relevant provisions of the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.