Tribunal Grants £1290 Exemption for Urgent Roof Repairs in London
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to skip the usual consultation process with tenants for urgent roof repairs because of a leak, as no objections were raised and no harm to tenants was identified.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may obtain dispensation from the consultation requirements of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for urgent repairs if there are no objections and no identified prejudice to the tenants.
📖 What the law says
The First-tier Tribunal can grant a request to skip the consultation requirements set by the Secretary of State if it finds it reasonable to do so, especially when dealing with urgent repairs like those needed due to a leak.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs due to a leak.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal granted dispensation to a landlord to bypass the consultation requirements of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for urgent roof repairs due to a leak, where no objections were raised and no prejudice was identified.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference : LON/00BE/LDC/2019/0197 Property : 64 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] :
[APPELLANT]. Respondents :
[redacted] (2) Ms [COUNSEL] (3) Mr. [COUNSEL] & Ms [COUNSEL] : N/A Types of Application : Dispensation – section 20ZA Tribunal Members : Judge Tagliavini
Date and venue of (paper) hearing
: 13 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Date of Decision
: 13 December 2019
DECISION
2
Decisions of the tribunal
I The tribunal grants the application to dispense with the section consultation provisions of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of urgent roof repairs to remedy a leak. _________________________________________________
The application
2. This is an application made under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“the Act). The applicant seeks the tribunal’s dispensation from the consultation provisions required by section 20 of the 1985 in respect of works said to be urgently required to the roof of the subject premises.
Background
3. The applicant is the freeholder of the subject premises pursuant to a lease of the First Floor Flat (with loft extension) dated 7 October 2014 made between [NAME] & [NAME] and the [NAME] and [NAME] [NAME].
The premises
4. The premises comprise three flats on the ground floor and rear garden flat, a ground floor flat and a flat on the first and second floor of a converted detached house.
The Applicant’s evidence
5. The applicant provided and relied upon a Statement of Case (undated) in support of this application. The applicant stated that it had been made aware of a leak form the roof into the first/second floor flat. The contractors [NAME] [NAME] was immediately commissioned to investigate the leak. An inspection was carried out on 28 October 2019 and a quotation for the cost of the works (including scaffolding) was provided the same day in the sum of £1290.
6. An application dated 5 November 2019 was made to the tribunal and directions were made on 11 November 2019, the tenants having been notified of the applicant’s intention to carry out the works of repair to the leaking roof and the intention to make this application to the tribunal in a letter dated 1 November 2019.
The Respondent’s evidence
6. No objection was made to this application either to the applicant or to the tribunal and no representations were received from the tenants.
3 The tribunal’s decisions and reasons
7. In the absence of any objections and the identification of any prejudice caused to the respondents, the tribunal accepts the urgent nature of these works. Therefore, in the circumstances, it considers it reasonable and appropriate to dispense with the requirements of section 20 of the 1985 Act in respect of the proposed works of repair to the leaking roof at the subject premises.
Signed: Judge Tagliavini
Dated: 13 December 2019
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £1250 Emergency Roof Repair Dispensation for Terraced House…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £15,582 Dispensation for Hot Water Cylinder Replacement in …
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal grants £4464 roof repairs dispensation in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Enfranchisement Premium at £22,000
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £10,000 Repair Dispensation for Terraced House in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Reasonable costs for lease extension decided by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £16,033 Rent Repayment Order for Unlicensed Tenancy in Lond…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal allows dispensation for £23,945 repair works in NW1
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Fire Safety Measures
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £10K Additional Works Dispensation at Lancaster Gate
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules on Fire Safety Works Costs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Dispensation with Consultation Requirem…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord seeks dispensation for urgent repairs.
- There are no objections raised by tenants.
- No identified prejudice to the tenants is present.
- The works are deemed reasonable to prevent danger to tenants.
- The landlord provides evidence showing no prejudice to tenants.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors listed as all cases favored the landlord)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal allowed the landlord to dispense with the consultation provisions for urgent roof repairs costing £1290.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about whether the landlord needed to consult tenants before making urgent repairs to a leaking roof.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant the application because the repairs were deemed urgent and necessary to fix a leak.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 was applied to allow dispensation from consultation provisions.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the urgency and necessity of the repairs to address a leaking roof.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case, allowing the landlord to proceed with the repairs.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to bypass consultation provisions if they can demonstrate the urgency and necessity of the repairs.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included a statement of case detailing the leak and the quotation for the repairs costing £1290.
