VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal sets £1,425/month rent for assured tenancy in London

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £1,425, which excludes water rates and council tax but includes other specified amounts.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14, as applied in this assured periodic tenancy case involving a monthly rent of £1,425.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The application can be made if the rent has not been previously determined under this section and if less than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £1,425 per month, effective from 6 October 2024.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £1,425 per month, effective from 6 October 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CAM/00KA/MNR/2024/0149

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 96 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 41 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1,425 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 6 October 2024

3. The amount included for services is

not applicable Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 6 October 2018

5. Length of the term or rental period 6 months

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Tenant liable for internal repairs. LL to comply with s11 LTA 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A

9. Description of premises The Property comprises an end/terraced house of brick and tile construction providing a sitting room, lounge and kitchen at ground floor level and three bedrooms with a family at first floor level. There is external car parking to the front and a garden to the rear.

[NAME] of Decision 26 November 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The court recognizes the tenant's right to have their rent assessed under the specified act.
  • Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 grants tenants the right to have their rent determined.
  • The Housing Act 1988 provides a clear pathway for tenants to request rent determination.
  • The tenant's application for rent determination under Section 14 is in accordance with legal requirements.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1,425, effective from 6 October 2024.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was over the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy, specifically whether it should be set at £1,425.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the monthly rent at £1,425, effective from 6 October 2024, based on the Housing Act 1988.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the monthly rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, confirming the monthly rent at £1,425.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be set according to the Housing Act 1988, potentially resulting in a similar monthly rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.