VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal sets £1042/month rent for assured tenancy in Derby

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £1042.00, excluding water rates and council tax, effective from January 13, 2023.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14, which was applied in this case involving a detached house in a rural location.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1042.00, effective from January 13, 2023.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £1042.00 per month, effective from January 13, 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/17UK/MNR/2022/0090

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]. [APPELLANT] [ADDRESS], Derby, De1 1FT

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £1042.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 13th January 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable ---------- Per ----------

4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1st April 1991

6. Length of the term or rental period Assured

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per Landlord and tenant Act

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A Dethatched house in a rural location comp, entrance porch, kitchen, hallway with cloak room and pantry off two living Rooms and sun room, on first floor are two double bedrooms, 1 single bedroom, box room and bathroom. Gas C.H, Double glazing.

[NAME] of Decision 13/01/2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £1042.00 per month.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the amount of rent for an assured periodic tenancy in a rural area near Derby.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £1042.00 per month, following the provisions of the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988 Section 14 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be set according to the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.