VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal sets £170 weekly rent for assured tenancy in Newcastle

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the weekly rent at £170, excluding water rates and council tax, effective from June 6, 2022.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14, which applies to assured periodic tenancies in Newcastle upon Tyne.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £170 per week, effective from June 6, 2022.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £170 per week, excluding water rates and council tax, effective from June 6, 2022.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CJ/MNR/2022/0098

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Benwell, Newcastle upon Tyne, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS], Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £170.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in para 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 06 June 2022

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 24 May 1993

5. Length of the term or rental period Weekly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Standard

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises Terrace House, 2 Reception, Kitchen, 3 Bedroom, Bathroom, rear yard

[NAME] of Decision 7 November 2022

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant requests a rent determination under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No relevant factors identified in the provided cases that went against the claimant.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the weekly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £170.00, effective from June 6, 2022.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about determining the rent for an assured periodic tenancy in Newcastle upon Tyne.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £170.00 per week, effective from June 6, 2022, based on the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14 to determine the rent for the assured periodic tenancy.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, as the rent was set according to the Housing Act 1988.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be determined according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.