VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets £500 Monthly Rent for Assured Tenancy in Dawlish

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £500.00 per month based on comparable rental evidence and their understanding of the local property market.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have the rent for an assured periodic tenancy set at a reasonable market rate based on comparable evidence and the local property market conditions.

Topics

tenancy agreementsrent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

Housing Act 1988 Section 14Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a reasonable market rent based on comparable evidence and local property market conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable rental evidence and its knowledge of the local property market.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable rental evidence and its knowledge of the local property market. The rent was set at £500.00 per calendar month, effective from 30 June 2019.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/18UH/MNR/2019/0043

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 24a The Strand, Dawlish, Devon, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] 15 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 500.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 30 June 2019

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 31 March 2014

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & [APPELLANT] 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises Flat over shop.

[NAME] of Decision 12 August 2019

1

Case Reference : CHI/18UH/MNR/2019/0043

Property : 24A The Strand, Dawlish, Devon [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted]

Landlord's Agent : [RESPONDENT] [NAME] of Application : received 10th June 2019

Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME]

: Considered on 12th August 2019

_______________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2019

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 12th August 2019 in the sum of £500.00 per calendar month.

2. An application was received by the Tribunal on 10th June 2019 from the [APPELLANT] of the above property regarding a referral in respect of a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.

3. The landlord's notice, which proposed a rent of £500.00 per calendar month with effect from 30th June 2019, in place of the current rent of £485.00 per calendar month is dated the 9th May 2019.

4. A written assured shorthold tenancy agreement dated 25th March 2014 was provided to the Tribunal. That agreement is in the common form with the Landlord responsible for maintaining the property and the [APPELLANT] responsible for keeping and maintaining the internal decorations and gardens.

Inspection 5. The Tribunal attended the premises on the 12th August at the appointed time of 10.30 am and after ringing the bell and knocking on the communal door and receiving no response the members left. The members returned at 10.45 and again tried ring the bell and knocked but there was still no reply so the members left. The Landlord was neither present nor represented.

6. The property occupies at town centre location within an established shopping area, fronting a one way street, in the seaside town of Dawlish and overlooks The Lawns, a grassed area of public open space.

7. The property comprises a first floor flat over a shop accessed via a common passage between two shops which is used for the storage paladin bins and other waste receptacles.

8. The accommodation: The Tribunal was unable to ascertain the extent of the accommodation because apart from being unable to gain access the [APPELLANT] had not completed the relevant section of the application form.

9. The Tribunal was therefore unable to ascertain the extent of the accommodation, the services provided nor the general condition of the flat or any fittings/furnishings provided.

Hearing 10. A hearing was not requested.

Landlord's Representations 11. In accordance with Directions issued on the 4th July 2019 the Landlord's agent had provided a letter dated 15th July 2019. This letter, under a paragraph headed: Details of lettings of similar properties (all unfurnished and all repairs/decoration responsibility of landlord), gives a list of 5 lettings which had taken place between July 2014 and October

3

2018. The rents achieved ranged from £495.00 to £550.00 per calendar month.

[APPELLANT]'s Representations 12. Other than the application the [APPELLANT] made no written representations.

The Tribunal’s Deliberations 13. The Tribunal may proceed to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy provided the notice under Section 13 is properly served in the prescribed form.

14. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 in the style prescribed by Statute.

15. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [APPELLANT] are not relevant to this issue.

16. The Tribunal finds itself in some difficulty as the Applicant [APPELLANT] has not explained to the Tribunal why he considers the rent proposed is too high. The agent for the Landlord has provided a list of lettings without any details analysing the differences/similarities to the subject property nor adjustment of the rents apparently achieved to allow for the differing dates of those lettings.

17. In determining whether or not to proceed with the application the Tribunal considered its duty under Rule 3 of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 (SI2013 No1169). Overriding objective and parties’ obligation to co-operate with the Tribunal 3.(1) The overriding objective of these Rules is to enable the Tribunal to deal with cases fairly and justly.

(2) Dealing with a case fairly and justly includes— (a) dealing with the case in ways which are proportionate to the importance of the case, the complexity of the issues, the anticipated costs and the resources of the parties and of the Tribunal; (b) avoiding unnecessary formality and seeking flexibility in the proceedings; (c) ensuring, so far as practicable, that the parties are able to participate fully in the proceedings; (d) using any special expertise of the Tribunal effectively; and (e) avoiding delay, so far as compatible with proper consideration of the issues.

(3) The Tribunal must seek to give effect to the overriding objective when it— (a) exercises any power under these Rules; or (b) interprets any rule or practice direction.

4

(4)Parties must— (a) help the Tribunal to further the overriding objective; and (b) co-operate with the Tribunal generally.

18. In reaching its decision to proceed the Tribunal considered:

a) The failure of the Applicant to comply with Direction No 2 of the Directions dated 4th July 2019 which specifically asked that the [APPELLANT] explain what he/or she considers the rent should be and why.

b) The fact the [NAME] had through its agent responded to the Application.

19. The Tribunal concluded, after considering its duty under Rule 3 (above), that it was appropriate to determine the application on the information provided by the parties.

20. The Tribunal is, however, an expert tribunal and not having been presented with any reliable comparable rental evidence is entitled to rely on its knowledge and experience of the relevant property market. With the benefit of that knowledge and their external inspection of the exterior and access passage to the property found that the market rent for the subject is £500.00 per calendar month

21. The rent will take effect from 30th June 2019 being the date specified by the landlord’s agent in the notice of increase.

Relevant Law 22. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

23. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)

[NAME]

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case which application must:- a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

5

b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking 2. If the application is not received within the 28-day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent is set based on the market rate for similar properties.
  • The condition of the property is considered when setting the rent.
  • The tenant refers to the Housing Act 1988 for rent determination.
  • The tribunal considers market comparables to determine a fair rent.
  • The rent reflects the open market value of properties in the area.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No factors identified as leading to unfavorable outcomes for tenants in these cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured tenancy at £500.00.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the proposed rent increase from £485.00 to £500.00 per calendar month.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £500.00 based on the open market value, as supported by the application under the Housing Act 1988.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the proposed rent with similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, setting the rent at £500.00 per calendar month.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can apply to the First-tier Tribunal to have the rent for their assured tenancy determined based on the open market value.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents that mattered included the application under the Housing Act 1988 and a list of similar property lettings.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.