VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal sets £640/month rent for assured tenancy in Newcastle

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £640, excluding water rates and council tax. This decision applies to the tenancy starting from April 2020.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined under the Housing Act 1988, section 14, specifically for an assured periodic tenancy in an end-terrace house.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The application cannot be made if the rent is already determined under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £640 per month, effective from February 25th, 2025.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The decision took effect on 14 February 2025, setting the monthly rent at £640 excluding water rates and council tax.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First Tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00EY/MNR/2024/0733

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises

The Tribunal members were 20 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME]

11-13 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £640 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3 & 4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 14-Feb-25

3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

4. Date periodic/statutory periodic assured tenancy commenced 14-Apr-20

5. Rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A

8. Description of premises End-terrace house Kitchen, Living Room, 2 Bedrooms, Bathroom Rear Yard

Chairman S [NAME] of Decision 10 April 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant requests a rent determination under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.| The court recognizes the tenant's right to have their rent determined under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.| The tenant's request aligns with the legal framework established by the Housing Act 1988.| The tenant invokes Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 correctly in their application.| The tenant’s application for rent determination is consistent with previous successful applications under Section 14.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £640, effective from February 14, 2025.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy, which was set at £640.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £640 per month, effective from February 14, 2025, based on the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988, section 14 to set the rent at £640 per month.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, as the rent was set at £640 per month.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

For someone in a similar situation, the rent for an assured periodic tenancy can be set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.