Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Ground-Floor Flat
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided to adjust the rent for a ground-floor flat to £1650 per month, starting from April 1st, 2022. This decision was based on the fair market conditions for the property.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their accommodation under an assured tenancy.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar property under the same conditions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal adjusted the rent for a ground-floor flat based on market conditions.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) adjusted the rent for a ground-floor flat to £1650 per month, effective from April 1st, 2022, based on fair market conditions under an assured tenancy.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/MNR/2022/0059
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord [NAME] c/o [NAME], 2 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1575.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 April 2022
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 November 2013
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy. S11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises Ground floor flat with living room/kitchen, bedroom, bathroom/WC. Underfloor heating.
[NAME] of Decision 12 July 2022
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BK/MNR/2022/0059 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) :
P: PAPERREMOTE
Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : In Person Respondent : [redacted] : [COUNSEL] of [NAME] : Market Rent under ss13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) :
[NAME] [NAME] and venue of hearing : 20 June 2022 at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 13 July 2022
DECISION
Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote hearing which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was CVP: CVPREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because all issues could be determined on at a video hearing followed by an inspection at the tenants request. The documents that the tribunal was referred to are the notice of increase, the [NAME] and covering correspondence from both parties, the contents of which the tribunal have noted. The tribunal inspected following the hearing. Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that the market rent is £1650 (one thousand six hundred and fifty pounds) per calendar month to take effect from 1 April 2022. (2) The tribunal makes the determinations as set out under the various headings in this decision. The [NAME]
1. The applicant seeks a determination pursuant to section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 following the service of a notice of increase dated 21 February 2022 proposing a new rent of £1260.28 per month in place of the existing rent of £1184.47 per month to take effect from 1 April 2022. The tribunal issued directions on 22 April 2022. The property 2. The subject property is a ground floor flat with a living room/kitchen, bedroom and bathroom. The Tenant’s evidence 3. The tenant’s [NAME] was received by the tribunal on 28 March 2022. Submissions included the landlords increase notice, correspondence regarding disrepair and a complaint using the Landlords complaints procedure. No comparables were provided. The Tenants submission also included a number of photograph which were not dated or titled and therefore of little evidential value.
4. The correspondence relating to repair is dated 2021. The reply form indicated that an inspection was not requested. The papers also asked if the tribunal could value on an intermediate rent basis.
The landlord’s evidence 5. The landlord provided a standard reply form confirming details of the accommodation but no other evidence. The Law 6. Section 14 the Housing Act 1988, allows a tenant who has received a notice of increase to apply to the tribunal for a determination of the rent which in the tribunal’s opinion the rent at which the dwelling might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as the tenancy, beginning at the beginning of the notice period and on the same terms other than the amount of rent as are contained in the tenancy. Valuation 7. The tribunal has no jurisdiction to rule on disputes relating to past disrepair or inherent defects. In the absence of detailed evidence of current disrepair, the tribunal will value on the assumption that the property is in a reasonable state of repair. The tribunal can only value on a market rent basis under the Act and not on an intermediate rent basis.
8. As no rental evidence was provided by the parties the tribunal relies on its knowledge and experience. The tribunal has considered the submissions and evidence regarding the condition of the property.
9. The tribunal considers that this flat, let in the market on an AST, unfurnished and with the usual amenities on normal market terms in the condition the market would expect would achieve a rent of £1750.00 per month The tribunal then deducted 5% for the absence of carpets curtains and white goods to come to a net rent of say £1650.00 per month.
10. No evidence of hardship has been provided so the rent increase takes effect from the date set out in the notice of increase.
Name: [NAME] [NAME]: 13 July 2022
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,100 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decis…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent for Poorly Maintained Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Plumstead Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjusted Due to Property Condition and Accessibility Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced for Unmodernised Property - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced Due to Property's Insulation Issues
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent is set at the market rate as determined by a First-tier Tribunal.
- The rent adjustment considers the property's condition and lack of modernisation.
- The market rental value is influenced by the property's age, location, and state of repair.
- Rent adjustments are made if the property has significant insulation and ventilation issues.
- The rent reflects the actual condition and value of the property.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent for a ground-floor flat was adjusted to £1650 per month, effective from April 1st, 2022.
Who was involved?
The tenant of a ground-floor flat and the landlord of the property.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the fair market conditions for the property, taking into account the condition of the flat and the market value.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the fair market value of the property, considering its condition and location.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, adjusting the rent to a fair market rate.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the fair market value of their property when negotiating rent adjustments.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and correspondence regarding the condition of the property were considered, though they were not dated or titled.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments under assured tenancies.
