Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Considering Property Condition and Location
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a a person considering its poor condition and noisy location. The rent was set at £1020 per calendar month, effective from 3 December 2020, after considering the a person's condition and the noise from nearby roads.
⚖️ Legal holding
The rent for a property should be determined based on its condition and location, excluding any improvements made by the tenant, according to the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
Under this rule, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent they are paying under their assured tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. When determining a fair rent, the tribunal must consider what a willing landlord would charge for the property in the open market, taking into account the condition and location of the property. Improvements made by the tenant are disregarded when calculating the rent.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent based on the property's condition and location, reducing the proposed rent significantly.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property considering its poor condition and noisy location, excluding improvements made by the tenant. The rent was set at £1020 per calendar month, effective from 3 December 2020.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – [NAME] Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AS/MNR/2019/0147
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 50 The Chase, Ickenham, Uxbridge, Middlesex, [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord (Haskell) [NAME]/[RESPONDENT] c/o [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 700.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 03 December 2019
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 05 October 2012
6. Length of the term or rental period Calendar Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs S.11 – Landlord & Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or [NAME]
9. Description of premises 1928 detached bungalow, four rooms, kitchen, bathroom/WC, generally in poor condition, Unmodernised.
[NAME] of Decision Friday 6th March 2020
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME]) Case Reference : LON/00AS/MNR/2019/0147 [NAME] : 50 The Chase, Ickenham, Middx [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] Representative : None Respondent : [redacted] Representative : [RESPONDENT].(Managing Agent) Type of Application : Section 13(4) Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr. [NAME]. [NAME] Mr. [NAME]. [NAME] and venue of Hearing : 6 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 6 March 2020
REASONS FOR DECISION
Background
1 The First Tier Tribunal received an application dated 24 November 2020, from the tenant of the [NAME] regarding a notice of increase of rent, served by the landlord, under S.13 of the Housing Act 1988 (the Act).
2 The notice, dated 29 October 2019, proposed a new rent of £1032.50 per calendar month, with effect from and including 3 December 2019. The rent payable up to and including 2 December 2019 was stated to be £1,000 pcm.
2
3 The tenancy is an assured periodic monthly tenancy. The current tenant succeeded the former regulated tenant, from and including 5 October 2012. No copy of any tenancy was provided.
Inspection
4 The Tribunal inspected the [NAME] on 6 March 2020. The tenant attended, the landlord did not.
5 The [NAME] is a late 1920’s detached bungalow. It is located in a quiet residential road in Uxbridge containing similar detached and semi- detached bungalows. However, the rear garden to the [NAME] backs directly onto the busy and noisy dual carriageway of the A40 and is very near its junction with the A437, [ADDRESS]. While the [NAME] is located a few minutes’ walk from the London Underground station at Hillingdon, it is also positioned near the flight path from RAF Northholt to the east. There are on-street parking restrictions.
6 The [NAME] has off street parking for one car, though the driveway is an unsealed track. It remains very much as it was built nearly a century ago with solid brick, partly rendered walls and a single lap clay tiled double pitched hipped roof of that era. The windows and external doors are the original timber. To the rear of the [NAME] is a full width plot, sizeable garden containing a number of basic lean-tos, sheds and a garage. They are simple timber framed structures, with an asbestos or steel sheeted construction. Between front and rear there is a narrow driveway to one side of the [NAME] and a narrow pedestrian access to the other.
7 The [NAME] is approximately square in footprint. All accommodation is at ground level. There is, via a small ladder access, a storage loft over. The accommodation comprises 4 rooms, kitchen bathroom/WC. The fittings and fittings of all rooms are either as constructed or contain minor and now very dated modernisations made by the former tenant in the late decades of the C19th. The kitchen and bathroom fittings are functional but very basic. There is partial secondary glazing. The heating is from old electric storage heaters in the principal rooms. The carpets and curtains have become the landlords since the succession but, are dated and in basic condition. The white goods are the tenants.
8 The [NAME] is in poor decorative order and repair outside and inside. Manifestly very few repairs let alone improvements have been made over the years or recently. Plasterwork throughout the interior walls, partitions and ceilings is in poor condition. Damp is an issue in small areas of some rooms.
Evidence
9 Directions, dated 24 December 2019, for the progression of the case, were issued. Neither party requested a hearing, but both made written
3 submissions. The landlord’s representations focused on local market evidence of rents for properties in good condition; the tenant’s representations set out the history of the letting, past improvements, the continuing neglect of the [NAME] by the landlord and the nuisance arising from the A40 in particular.
Law
10 In accordance with the terms of S14 of the Act we are required to determine the rent at which we consider the [NAME] might reasonably be expected to let in the open market, by a willing landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy; ignoring any increase in value attributable to tenant’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy. Thus, the [NAME] falls to be valued as it stands; but assuming that the [NAME] to be in a reasonable internal decorative condition. The value, if any, of all historic improvements carried out under the preceding regulated tenancy, were not ignored when setting the rent.
Decision
11 Based on the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in Hillingdon, we determine that the subject [NAME] would let on normal Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) terms, for £1,700 per calendar month, fully fitted and in good order. However, the Tribunal must discount this rent for: functional but, basic nature of the bathroom and kitchen; the absence of full double glazing; the absence of full central heating; the dated and limited nature of the electrical installation; the absence of landlord’s ‘white goods’, modern floor finishes and curtains; and the poor condition of roof, windows, doors, walls and ceilings. The Tribunal also noted the proximity of the A40 and the almost continuous noise and fumes arising, though mitigated in part, by the [NAME]’s proximity to the underground railway station to central London. To reflect all of these we accordingly deduct £680, and thus determine the new rent on review, at £1020 per calendar month.
12 This rent is less than that proposed in the landlord’s notice. However, we adopt the same effective date as set out in their notice so that the new rent will take effect from 3 December 2020, the date given in that notice.
[NAME] 6 March 2020
S.14 Housing Act 1988:
Determination of rent by Tribunal.
(1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to [F2the appropriate tribunal] a notice under
4 subsection (2) of that section, the [F3appropriate tribunal] shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the [F3appropriate tribunal] consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy—
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates;
(b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice;
(c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and
(a) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded—
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant;
(b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement—
(i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to [NAME], or
(ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to [NAME] being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and
(c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely—
5
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and
(b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and
(c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.
In making a determination under this section in any case where under Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 the landlord or a [NAME] is liable to pay council tax in respect of a hereditament (“the relevant hereditament”) of which the dwelling-house forms part, the Tribunal] shall have regard to the amount of council tax which, as at the date on which the notice under section 13(2) above was served, was set by the billing authority—
(a) for the financial year in which that notice was served, and
(b) for the category of dwellings within which the relevant hereditament fell on that date,
but any discount or other reduction affecting the amount of council tax payable shall be disregarded.
(3B) In subsection (3A) above—
(a) “hereditament” means a dwelling within the meaning of Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992,
(b) “billing authority” has the same meaning as in that Part of that Act, and
(c) “category of dwellings” has the same meaning as in section 30(1) and (2) of that Act.
(4) In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the M1Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture [F6, in respect of council tax] or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements.
6 (5) Where any rates in respect of the dwelling-house concerned are borne by the landlord or a [NAME], the [F7appropriate tribunal] shall make their determination under this section as if the rates were not so borne.
(6) In any case where—
(a) the Tribunal have before them at the same time the reference of a notice under section 6(2) above relating to a tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 6 reference”) and the reference of a notice under section 13(2) above relating to the same tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 13 reference”), and
(a) the date specified in the notice under section 6(2) above is not later than the first day of the new period specified in the notice under section 13(2) above, and
(b) the Tribunal propose to hear the two references together,
the Tribunal shall make a determination in relation to the section 6 reference before making their determination in relation to the section 13 reference and, accordingly, in such a case the reference in subsection(1)(c) above to the terms of the tenancy to which the notice relates shall be construed as a reference to those terms as varied by virtue of the determination made in relation to the section 6 reference.
(7) Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the Tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the Tribunal may direct.
(8) Nothing in this section requires the Tribunal to continue with their determination of a rent for a dwelling-house if the landlord and tenant give notice in writing that they no longer require such a determination or if the tenancy has come to an end.
(9) This section shall apply in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy as if in subsection (1) the reference to an assured tenancy were a reference to an assured shorthold tenancy.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Under Housing Act 1988
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy Under Housing Act 1988
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Double Room at £650
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Higher Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Dispute
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property as determined by the Tribunal.
- The landlord must set the rent according to statutory requirements under the Housing Act 1988.
- The tenant can dispute a landlord's proposed rent increase under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent determination reflecting the open market value of the property, adjusted for its condition.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment reflecting the property's condition and amenities compared to modern open market standards.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a fair rent for a property considering its poor condition and noisy location.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered the property's condition and location, setting a rent of £1020 per month, effective from 3 December bk 2020.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 s.14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the noise from nearby roads.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition and location of their property when negotiating rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The condition of the property and the noise from nearby roads were important factors.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
