VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The rent was set at £800 per month, excluding certain costs like water rates and council tax. This decision helps clarify the financial obligations between the tenant and landlord.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent registered under the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent registration

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988 Section 14, a tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might reasonably expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988 Section 14. The rent was set at £800 per calendar month, excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts specified in the judgment. The decision took effect on May 1, 2022.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AM/MNR/2022/0053

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 4 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 48 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 800.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 May 2022

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 07 February 2020

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 Landlord and tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Room in shared furnished house

9. Description of premises Single bedroom in shared 3 bedroom house

Chairman A [NAME] of Decision 20 June 2022

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent registered under the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment reflecting the disrepair and poor condition of the property.
  • A landlord can adjust the rent based on the condition of the property and local market conditions.
  • A tenant is entitled to a rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the condition of the property.
  • A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the open market value while considering the tenant's ability to pay.
  • A tenant is entitled to a rent determination under an assured periodic tenancy as per the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at the open market rate as determined by a tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.
  • A tenant is entitled to a register of rents under an assured periodic tenancy as per Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £800 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which requires the registration of rents for assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the proper calculation and registration of the rent under the Housing Act.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting the rent as requested.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their rent is properly registered according to the Housing Act.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as tenancy agreements and previous rent payments likely played a role.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can often be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It's always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent registration.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.