VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent of £1229.50 for a property, following the guidelines set by the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. This ensures the rent is fair and reasonable.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation based on the Retail Price Index and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Topics

fair rentrent act 1977retail price index

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, adjusting it according to the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent of £1229.50 for a property, adhering to the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The decision was based on the Retail Price Index and the number of properties with similar accommodation available for rent.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/43UH/F77/2025/0611

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 46 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr J [NAME] Judge Gethin

Landlord [COMPANY]

Tenant Mr & Mrs [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The fair rent is £1229.50 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 23 April 2025

3. The amount for services is £11.39 included Per Calendar Month

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £1550.00 per Calendar Month including £11.39 per Calendar Month for services.

[NAME] of decision 23 April 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE March 2025 X 395.30

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE May 2022 Y 337.10

X 395.30 Minus Y 337.10 = (A) 58.20

(A) 58.20 Divided by Y 337.10 = (B) 0.1726

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999? NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) n/a

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.2226

Last registered rent* £1005.50 Multiplied by (C) = £1229.32 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £1229.50

Variable service charge? NO If YES add amount for services n/a

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1229.50 Per Calendar Month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/43UH/F77/2025/0611 Property : 46 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenants : [NAME] :

None

Landlord : A2Dominion Group Representative : None Type of Application :

Section 70 Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Determination by the First-Tier Tribunal of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer.

Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] Judge Gethin Date of Objection : 11th February 2025 Date of Decision and Summary Reasons :

23rd April 2025

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1229.50 per month with effect from 23rd April 2025. The Landlord has indicated that it will not charge the full rent.

HAV/43UH/F77/2025/0611 2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 6th November 2024 the Landlord applied to the Rent Officer for the registration of a new rent for the property in accordance with Section 70 of the Rent Act 1977.

2. The rent was previously registered at £1005.50 per month from 12th May 2022 following a determination by the Rent Officer.

3. On 5th February 2025 the Rent Officer registered a new rent of £1044 per month for the property to take effect from the 5th February 2025.

4. On 11th February 2025 the Tenants objected to this new rent and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property), formerly a Rent Assessment Committee. Inspection 5. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence

6. There were no written submissions from either party. Determination and Valuation 7. Having consideration to the comparable evidence provided and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £1700 per calendar month.

8. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets and curtains/blinds to all be provided by the Landlord. The Landlord would also be responsible for internal repair and decoration.

9. In this case the property is not let with white goods, carpets and curtains all supplied therefore some adjustments to the ‘open market rent’ are necessary. In addition, the Tribunal has made an adjustment for the Tenants responsibility for internal decoration.

10. The Tribunal noted the numbers of properties with similar accommodation within a reasonable distance of the property that are available to rent and decided that no deduction for scarcity should be made.

11. The full valuation is shown below:- Full open market rent in good condition £1700

HAV/43UH/F77/2025/0611 3 Less deductions for:- Tenants’ liability for internal decoration

£60 Tenant’s provision of white goods

£30 Tenant’s provision of carpets and curtains

£60

____

Total deduction per month

£150 TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH

£1550

12. Having made the adjustments indicated above the Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 was £1550 per calendar month.

13. The Section 70 Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal is above the maximum fair rent of £1229.50 permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Accordingly, the lower amount of £1229.50 is to be registered as the Fair rent with effect from 23rd April 2025, this being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.

14. The Landlord is a [NAME] and has indicated that it will not charge the full amount of the rent assessed.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent was calculated by increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index.
  • A 5% increase was added because this was a second or subsequent application for re-registration since February 1, 1999.
  • The final rent amount was rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
  • The maximum fair rent was determined to be £1229.50 per calendar month.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £1229.50 for a property.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court used the Retail Price Index and compared similar properties to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the calculation based on the Retail Price Index.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be fairly calculated based on the current Retail Price Index.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence and information about similar properties were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.