Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property considering the property's condition and market comparables. The decision was made in accordance with the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market conditions and the state of repair of the property.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property considering various factors including the property's condition and market comparables.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property considering various factors including the property's condition and market comparables. The decision was made in accordance with the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/F77/2022/0092
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 1st & 2nd floor [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [APPELLANT]
Landlord [NAME]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is 30,971 Per Annum (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 3rd August 2022
3. The amount for services is Not applicable Per Annum
negligible/not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Not applicable Per annum
negligible/not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf.
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
None
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ £39,000 per annum including £Nil per annum for services.
(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ ......... per ................... including £ ......................................... per ................................ for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 3rd August 2022
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 340
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 290.6
X 340 Minus Y 290.6 = (A) 49.4
(A) 49.4 Divided by Y 290.6 = (B) 0.219993
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.21999
Last registered rent* £25,386 Multiplied by (C) = £30,970.8 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £30971
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services N/a
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £30,970.00 Per Annum
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the
variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BK/F77/2022/0092 Property : 1st & 2nd [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : Ms [COUNSEL] Respondent : [redacted] : None Date of application : 24 February 2022 Type of application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977 Tribunal member(s) :
[NAME] Registered Valuer 0079475 [NAME] Registered Valuer
Venue : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 3 August 2022
DECISION
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2014
Background
1. The Landlord applied to the Rent Officer for the registration of a fair rent for this property on 18 March 2022.
2. A fair rent of £29, 241.50 per annum was registered on 14 April 2022 following the application. The Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] subsequently challenged the registered rent and the Rent Officer has requested the matter to be referred to the tribunal for determination.
3. Directions were issued on 8th June 2022 by the tribunal.
4. The parties were invited to submit any relevant information and submissions. Written submissions were received from both the Tenant and the Landlord’s representative.
5. The Landlord was represented by Ms [COUNSEL] from [RESPONDENT], assisted by Ms [NAME] her associate. Mr [NAME] was a litigant in person.
Hearing
6. This was a face-to-face hearing held on 3 August 2022.
7. Mr [NAME] described to the tribunal the defects present at the property which included aged plumbing, water penetration through a defective roof, failed render to the rear of the property, damaged windows, defective guttering and a damaged front door. He also mentioned that the narrow staircase does not comply with current Building Regulations. He said that the Landlord carried out little or no maintenance.
8. He described to the tribunal the improvements he had undertaken during his tenancy which included upgrading the first floor bathroom and comprehensive redecoration throughout the property. He offered no comparable rental information.
9. Ms [NAME] contended that [COMPANY] maintained the property to a reasonable standard and had recently replaced the combi boiler.
10. Ms [APPELLANT] advised that the premises are held by the tenant on a full internal repairing and insuring lease. The tribunal were not provided with a copy of the lease. She said that the water penetration caused by the defective roof was being addressed at the time of the hearing.
11. Ms [NAME] offered recent transaction evidence from comparable property which included [ADDRESS], a 1,300 sq ft, 3 bedroom house which was let on a assured shorthold tenancy in June 2022 at £1,750 per month. She claimed that this presented a good rental comparable to the subject dwelling. She also offered the tribunal two properties in [ADDRESS], numbers 176c and [ADDRESS]. These are of a similar size of approximately 900 sq ft to the subject and were let at £1,275 and £1,150 per week respectively.
12. Ms [NAME] contended that a fair rent for this property is £49,900 per annum equivalent to around £959.62 per week. Inspection
13. The tribunal inspected the property following the hearing.
14. The property is a mid-terraced 2/3 bedroom dwelling in a row of similar style properties. It is located within the proximity of the usual amenities and in a particularly desirable area of West London. It has a large self- contained rear garden.
15. The inspection revealed penetrating dampness to internal walls, metal windows to bedroom 3, damage to other window fittings and dated electrical wiring.
The law 16. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, “the Act”, it had regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also disregarded the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.
17. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] the Court of Appeal emphasised that
ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity'. This is that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms.
18. The Tribunal are aware that [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB.92 is a relevant authority in registered rent determination. This authority states where good market rental comparable evidence i.e., assured shorthold tenancies is available enabling the identification of a market rent as a starting point it is wrong to rely on registered rents. The decision stated: “If there are market rent comparables from which the fair rent can be derived why bother with fair rent comparables at all”.
19. The market rents charged for assured tenancy lettings often form appropriate comparable transactions from which a scarcity deduction is made.
20. These market rents are also adjusted where appropriate to reflect any relevant differences between those of the subject and comparable rental properties.
21. The Upper Tribunal in Trustees of the Israel Moss Children’s Trust v Bandy [2015] explained the duty of the First Tier Tribunal to present comprehensive and cogent fair rent findings. These directions are applied in this decision.
22. The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 applies to all dwelling houses where an application for the registration of a new rent is made after the date of the Order and there is an existing registered rent under part IV of the Act. This article restricts any rental increase to 5% above the previously registered rent plus retail price indexation (Rpi) since the last registered rent. The relevant registered rent in this matter was registered on 4 February 2020 at £27,569 per annum. The rent registered on 28 April subject to an Objection and subsequent determination by Tribunal is not relevant to this calculation.
Valuation
23. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to their general knowledge of market rent levels in this area of West London.
24. This hypothetical rent is adjusted as necessary to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the date of the inspection. Any rental benefit derived from Tenant’s improvements is disregarded. It is also necessary to disregard the effect of any disrepair or other defects attributable to the Tenant or any predecessor in title. No adjustments are made to the transaction evidence in assessment of the rent for this property.
25. The responsibility for internal maintenance of this property under the tenancy agreement is the responsibility of the Tenant. The Tribunal are told this includes all service provision.
26. The provisions of section 70(2) of the Rent Act 1977 in effect require the elimination of what is called “scarcity”. The required assumption is of a neutral market. Where a Tribunal considers that there is, in fact, substantial scarcity, it must make an adjustment to the rent to reflect that circumstance. In the present case neither party provided evidence with regard to scarcity.
27. The Tribunal then considered the decision of the High Court in [COMPANY] v [NAME] [2002] EWHC 835 (Admin) which required it to consider scarcity over a wide area rather than limit it to a particular locality. West London is now considered to be an appropriate area to use as a yardstick for measuring scarcity and it is clear that there is a substantial measure of scarcity in West London.
28. Assessing a scarcity percentage cannot be a precise arithmetical calculation. It can only be a judgement based on the years of experience of members of the Tribunal. The Tribunal therefore relied on its own combined knowledge and experience of the supply and demand for similar properties on the terms of the regulated tenancy (other than as to rent) and in particular to unfulfilled demand for such accommodation. In doing so, the Tribunal found that there was substantial scarcity in the locality of West London and
therefore made a further deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element.
29. The valuation of a fair rent is an exercise that relies upon relevant market rent comparable transactions and property specific adjustments. The fair rents charged for other similar properties in the locality do not form relevant transaction evidence.
30. Table 1 below provides details of the fair rent calculation:
Property: 1/2nd [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Fair rent calculation in accordance with s(70) Rent Act 1977 Market rent £78,000.00 per annum Disregards Deduction per annumas % annum rent £5,850.00 7.50% Full internal repairing lease £11,700.00 15.00% Summerhouse Dilapidations Deduction per annumas % annum rent Penetrating dampness to lounge and kitchen £1,950.00 2.50% Poor quality window fittings £1,950.00 2.50% No central heating at commencement of tenancy £5,850.00 7.50% Improvements undertaken by tenant Installed replacement kitchen units - £ Installed Ensuite bathroom £1,950.00 2.50% £29,250.00 35.00% Adjusted Rent balance £48,750.00 Less Scarcity 20.00% adjusted market rent £9,750.00 Adjusted Market Rent £39,000.00 per annum Uncapped rent Capped rent in accordance with 30,970.75 £ per annum Capped rent Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999
Total deductions Carpets , curtains white, goods, soft furnishing
Decision 31. The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order will apply to this determination. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal for the purposes of Section 70 is £39,000 per annum by virtue of the rent acts maximum fair order 1999 the maximum fair rent that can be registered for this property is £30,970.75 per annum. This is based on a specific 5% increase plus any retail price increases on the previously registered rent of £25,386 per annum.
32. The statutory formula applied to the previously registered rent is at Annex A.
33. Details of the maximum fair rent calculations were provided with the original notice of decision.
34. Accordingly, the sum that will be registered as a fair rent with effect from 3 August 2022 is £30,970.75 per annum.
Valuer Chairman: [NAME]: 27 October 2022
Appendix A The Rents Act (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 (1) Where this article applies, the amount to be registered as the rent of the dwelling-house under Part IV shall not, subject to paragraph (5), exceed the maximum fair rent calculated in accordance with the formula set out in paragraph (2).
(2) The formula is:
MFR = LR [1 + (x-y) +P]
y
where:
• 'MFR' is the maximum fair rent; • 'LR' is the amount of the existing registered rent to the dwelling-house; • 'x' is the index published in the month immediately preceding the month in which the determination of a fair rent is made under Part IV; • 'y' is the published index for the month in which the rent was last registered under Part IV before the date of the application for registration of a new rent; and • 'P' is 0.075 for the first application for rent registration of the dwelling- house after this Order comes into force and 0.05 for every subsequent application.
(3) Where the maximum fair rent calculated in accordance with paragraph (2) is not an integral multiple of 50 pence the maximum fair rent shall be that amount rounded up to the nearest integral multiple of 50 pence.
(4) If (x-y) + P is less than zero the maximum fair rent shall be the y existing registered rent.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Tenant Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Central London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Condition and Amenities
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Central London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Central London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Central London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Considering Property Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent was capped by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, which limits increases.
- The tribunal considered the property's age, location, and state of repair when determining the fair rent.
- The tribunal disregarded tenant improvements when assessing the rental value.
- A deduction of 20% was made from the adjusted market rent due to substantial scarcity in West London.
- The tenant was responsible for internal maintenance and all service provision under the tenancy agreement.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's argument for a fair rent of £49,900 per annum was not accepted.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a fair rent for a property considering various factors including the property's condition and market comparables.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord, with the tenant challenging the registered rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, taking into account the property's condition and market comparables.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's condition and market comparables.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market comparables.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the property's condition and market comparables when challenging a registered rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence and documents related to the property's condition and market comparables were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving the determination of a fair rent.
