VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £175.50 Per Week

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent of £175.50 per week for a property after considering the market rent and making adjustments based on the property's condition and amenities. This decision was made under the Rent Act 1977 and the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, subject to the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999.

Topics

fair rent determinationmaximum fair rentrent act 1977

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, applying the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £175.50 per week for a property under the Rent Act 1977, applying the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999. The Tribunal considered comparable properties and adjusted the market rent accordingly.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AP/F77/2023/0316

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 20b [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge [NAME]

Landlord [COMPANY]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £175.50 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 11 December 2023

3. The amount for services is Not applicable Per

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Not applicable Per

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

None

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £190 ....................................................................................................................................................................... per week including £ ..... per ................................... for services (variable).

(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ ................... per .................... including £ ......................................... per ................................. for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

Chairman Tribunal Judge Sarah McKeown Date of decision 11 December 2023

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 377.8

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 293.5

X 377.8 Minus Y 293.5 = (A) 84.3

(A) 84.3 Divided by Y 293.5 = (B) 0.287223

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.337223

Last registered rent* £131 Multiplied by (C) = £175.18 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £175.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £175.50 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : TR/LON/00AP/F77/2023/0316 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) : P:PAPERREMOTE

Property : 20b [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tenant : Mr. [APPELLANT] Landlord : [COMPANY] of Application : Determination of a Fair Rent – Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal Members : Judge [NAME] and venue of Consideration : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Date of Summary Reasons : 11 December 2023

Description of hearing This has been a paper hearing which the parties are taken to have consented to, as explained below. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined in a paper hearing. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. The Tribunal’s decision is below.

DECISION The sum of £175.50 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 11 December 2023, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision.

2

SUMMARY REASONS

The Background 1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

2. No inspection was carried out. Evidence 3. The Tribunal has considered the application by the Landlord (with the list of comparable properties), the objection from the Tenant (asserting that there are outstanding structural repairs). Determination and Valuation 4. The Tribunal considered the list of comparable properties and used its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area. We consider that the open market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect would be in the region of £340 per week. From this level of rent, we have made adjustments in relation to: (a) No furniture provided; (b) No white goods; (c) No curtains or floor coverings; (d) No central heating.

5. The full valuation is shown below: Per week

Market rent

£340

Less condition & terms

30% -£102

Adjusted rent

£238

3

Less scarcity

20% -£47.60

Fair rent

£190.40 (adjusted to £190) 6. The Tribunal therefore determines a rent of £190 per week for the purposes of s.70.

Decision 7. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal for the purposes of s.70 was £190 per week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £175.50. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case, the lower rent of £175.50 per week is to be registered as the fair rent for this property. Name: Judge Sarah McKeown Date: 11 November 2023

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties and indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent was calculated by increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index.
  • The calculation included an additional 5% because it was a second or subsequent application since February 1, 1999.
  • The final rent was rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
  • The Tribunal used its own expert knowledge of rental values in the area.
  • The uncapped fair rent was adjusted downwards due to the absence of furniture, white goods, curtains, floor coverings, and central heating.
  • The uncapped fair rent was further adjusted downwards to account for scarcity.
  • The capped rent, which was lower than the uncapped fair rent, was registered as the fair rent.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £175.50 per week for a property.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the market rent and adjusted it according to the property's condition and amenities.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the adjustment of the market rent based on the property's condition and amenities.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair rent determination through the First-tier Tribunal.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable property lists and the property's condition and amenities were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.