VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £208 Per Week

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent of £208 per week for a rented property, taking into account the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjusted for property conditions and scarcity, subject to statutory caps.

Topics

fair rent determinationmaximum fair rentproperty condition adjustments

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, adjusting for various factors including property condition and scarcity of similar properties.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent of £208 per week for a property, considering adjustments for property conditions and scarcity, under the Rent Act 1977.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BD/F77/2025/0117

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 60 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Judge Tagliavini Mrs S Redmond MRICS

Landlord [NAME]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £208 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 3 June 2025

3. The amount for services is

Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ 249.60 per week.

(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ ................... per .................... including £ per for services (variable)

[NAME] Judge Tagliavini

Date of decision 3 June 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 402.2

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 358.3

X 402.2 Minus Y 358.3 = (A) 43.9

(A) 43.9 Divided by Y 358.3 = (B) 0.122523

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.172523

Last registered rent* 177.00 Multiplied by (C) = 207.53 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £208

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £208 Per week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference

: LON/00BD/F77/2025/0117

Property : 60 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mrs [APPELLANT]

Landlord : Mr [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 11 February 2025

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Judge Tagliavini

Mrs S Redmond MRICS

Date

: 3 June 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £208 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 3 June 2025 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection

2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence

3. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Landlord and the Tenant.

Determination and Valuation

4. Having consideration of the comparable evidence provided by the parties and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition/ its current condition would be in the region of £520 per week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments of 40% in relation to:

Lack of central heating; External disrepair: Unmodernised kitchen; Unmodernised bathroom; Lack of white goods: Terms of tenancy :

Adjusted market rent: £312 per week

5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment of 20% for scarcity which provides a weekly rent of £249.60.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

Market Rent

£520

Less

40%

Less

Scarcity

20% £62.40

Fair rent:

£249.60 per week

3

7. The Tribunal determines a Fair Rent of £249.60 per week.

Decision

8. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £249.60 per week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £208 per week.

9. The Landlord has carried works since the last rent registration to roof and drains. These will have a minimal effect on rental and would not exceed 15% of previous rent i.e. £26.55. The tribunal received the Tenant’s comments on damp before works. Taking a further 5% deduction for condition if works not carried out (ie 45%) gives an adjusted market rent of £286 which equates to £228.80 after scarcity. The difference is £249.60-£228.8=£20.80. This is less than 15% of previous rent so the Maximum Fair Rent cap applies.

10. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of £208 per week is to be registered as the fair rent for this property.

[NAME]: Judge Tagliavini

Date: 3 June 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjusted for the property's condition.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects market conditions.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent subject to statutory caps.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a fair rent of £208 per week for a rented property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court used a formula under the Rent Act 1977 to determine the fair rent, considering the property's condition and scarcity.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The scarcity of similar properties and the condition of the property were crucial arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be similarly adjusted based on property conditions and scarcity.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from both parties and comparable evidence were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but specific procedures must be followed.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.