VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a rented a person, setting it at £825.50 per month. This decision was made following an objection from the tenant and uses the formula specified by the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

⚖️ Legal holding

The fair rent is capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Topics

fair rent calculationmaximum fair rentRent Act 1977

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the market rent based on the property's condition and scarcity, resulting in a fair rent subject to capping under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, applying the formula for calculating the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The fair rent was set at £825.50 per month, effective from 16 November 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – [NAME] Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AY/F77/2023/0186

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge P [NAME] [NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £825.50 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 16 November 2023

3. The amount for services is £166.31 Per month

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

£72.34 Per month

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £1,020 per month.

Chairman P. [NAME] of decision 16 November 2023

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 378.4

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 301.1

X 378.4 Minus Y 301.1 = (A) 77.3

(A) 77.3 Divided by Y 301.1 = (B) 0.2567253404

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.3067253404

Last registered rent* £631.50 Multiplied by (C) = 1.3067253404 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £825.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £825.50 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AY/F77/2023/0186

[NAME] : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Objection : 19 May 2023

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Judge P [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 16 November 2023

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £825.50 per calendar month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 16 November 2023, being the date on which the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME])

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection 2. The Tribunal carried out an inspection of the [NAME] on 16 November 2023.

Evidence 3. The Tribunal has considered the brief written submissions provided by the Tenant and the more detailed oral submissions made by the Tenant at the hearing. There were no written submissions from the Landlord and the Landlord did not attend the hearing. Neither party provided its own comparable evidence.

Determination and Valuation 4. Having considered the comparable evidence sourced by us, which we put to the Tenant at the hearing to enable him to comment, and also with the benefit of our own general knowledge of rental values in the area as an expert Tribunal, our view is that the open market rent for the [NAME] would be in the region of £2,000 per calendar month if it was in good condition. From this level of rent we have made adjustments to reflect the actual condition of the [NAME] and other relevant factors.

To reflect the poor condition of the windows and doors (including the front door), the lack of a modern kitchen and bathroom, the electrics and the fact that there is only one radiator we have made a deduction of 25%.

To reflect the fact that the Landlord has not supplied white goods, carpets, curtains or furniture and the fact that the Tenant has internal decorating obligations we have deducted a further 15%.

5. The Tribunal has also made a 20% deduction for scarcity.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

per calendar month Market Rent

£2,000

Less Deduction of 25% to reflect poor condition

£500

____ NEW SUB-TOTAL

£1,500

Less

Further deduction of 15% to reflect lack of white goods etc

£225

3

____ NEW SUB-TOTAL

£1,275

Less Scarcity at approx. 20%

£255

____ TOTAL

£1,020

7. Therefore the uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £1,020 per calendar month. However, the [NAME] qualifies for capping, and the capped rent for the [NAME] according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £825.50 per calendar month. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of £825.50 per calendar month is to be registered as the fair rent for the [NAME].

Chairman: Judge P [NAME]: 16 November 2023

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent was capped because the property qualified under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The previous registered rent was increased by the percentage change in the retail price index.
  • A 5% increase was added to the calculation because this was a second or subsequent application since February 1999.
  • The Tribunal used its expert knowledge of rental values in the area to determine the open market rent.
  • A 25% deduction was applied to the market rent due to the poor condition of the property, including windows, doors, and lack of modern kitchen/bathroom.
  • A further 15% deduction was made because the landlord did not provide white goods, carpets, curtains, or furniture, and the tenant had decorating obligations.
  • A 20% deduction was applied for scarcity, reducing the overall fair rent.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The fair rent for the property was set at £825.50 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant objected to the rent determination, and the landlord was involved but did not attend the hearing.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court used the formula prescribed by the Rent Act 1979 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the calculation method for determining the maximum fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, as the fair rent was set at a lower rate than the initial determination.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined using the same formula if they object to the rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence and the condition of the property were important in the decision.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but the details of how to do so are provided in the full reasons.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.