VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The tribunal decided on the market rent for a property under an assured tenancy. They considered the condition of the property and ignored any improvements made by the tenant. The decision was made by Judge D Brandler and a person MRICS on July 1, 2021.

⚖️ Legal holding

A willing landlord under an assured tenancy can expect to let a property at a reasonable market rent, as determined by the tribunal under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured tenancymarket rent

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this section, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under an assured tenancy, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. The tribunal will then determine a reasonable market rent that a willing landlord would expect to receive for a similar tenancy. The tribunal considers the terms of the existing tenancy and disregards certain factors like improvements made by the tenant.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal determined the market rent for a property based on the Housing Act 1988, considering the condition of the property and disregarding tenant improvements.

📜 Headnote Official document

The tribunal determined the market rent for a property based on the Housing Act 1988, considering the condition of the property and disregarding tenant improvements. The decision was made by Judge D Brandler and Mrs S Phillips MRICS on July 1, 2021.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BE/MNR/2021/0007

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Judge D Brandler Mrs S [NAME] 6 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1250.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1st July 2021

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable n/a Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 04/11/2017

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs s.11

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Table and chairs, cupboard, armchair, washing machine

9. Description of premises A 6th floor, two bedroom flat with an open plan living room/kitchen, & bathroom.

Chairman Judge D Brandler Date of Decision 1st July 2021

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BE/MNR/2021/0007 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] Respondent : [redacted] Market Rent under s13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) : Tribunal Judge Brandler Mrs S Phillips, MRICS Date of decision : 1st July 2021 Date of reasons for the decision : 15th July 2021

DECISION

Decision of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that the market rent is £1250.00 per calendar month (“pcm”). (2) The tribunal makes the determinations as set out under the various headings in this decision. The application 1. The applicant seeks a determination pursuant to section 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 following the service of a notice dated 17/08/2020 by the landlord proposing a rent increase to £1450.00 pcm from 04/10/2020, rising from the rent previously payable of £1000.00 pcm.

2. On 01/10/2020 the Tribunal received an application under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988. The landlord’s notice of rent increase was included with the application.

3. On 31/03/2021 the Tribunal issued directions.

4. Neither party requested an oral hearing.

5. Both parties provided extensive written submissions. Background 6. The applicant has been a tenant at [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (“the property”) since 04/11/2017. She lives there with her two adult daughters. The property is a 6th floor, two-bedroom flat with one bathroom, and an open plan living room/kitchen.

7. A tenancy agreement was provided. The rent has been £1000 pcm since the beginning of the tenancy. The submissions 8. It is clear from the submissions from both parties that there has been some acrimony between them during the course of the Covid-19 Pandemic. The difficulties between them appear to have started around the same time as the first lockdown in March 2020. The only issue agreed by the parties is that they previously had some sort of employee/employer relationship that began before the start of the tenancy and ended in March 2020.

9. The majority of the issues described at length in the submissions are not relevant to these proceedings.

10. Of those that do touch on the tenancy, these include allegations by the tenant in relation to an alleged attempted illegal eviction, an alleged invalid s.21 Notice, lack of gas certification and attempts to inspect during lockdown.

11. The Landlord asserts that he let the property to the tenant at a reduced market rate of rent because they had some sort of employer/employee relationship. He says that when they parted company in March 2020, for reasons that are not relevant to these proceedings, he gave her notice to leave. He further alleges that any complaints made by the tenant about the property in relation to condition are as a result of the way the tenant has used the property.

12. The tenancy agreement provides no mention of a reduction from market rent. Nor does it refer to a service agreement and no correspondence has been provided to support that assertion. The Law 13. We must first determine that the landlord’s notice under section 13(2) satisfied the requirements of that section and was validly served.

14. The Housing Act 1988, section 14 requires us to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

15. In so doing we are required by section 14(1), to ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act. Valuation 16. In coming to its decision, the tribunal had regard to the representations made by the tenant in relation to the condition, which appeared to the tribunal to be general wear and tear over the course of a four-year tenancy. The Landlord’s allegations of damage caused by the tenant are dismissed as there is nothing to suggest that is not fair wear and tear during the course of a tenancy.

17. The tribunal taking all of this into account considered that property would be worth £1300.00 per month in the open market in a fully modernised condition and applied a deduction of £50 pcm in relation to decorations. The Tribunal determined that the rent for this property is £1250.00 per month. Effective date

18. Under s14 (7) of the Housing Act 1988 the effective date of the decision would normally be the date shown on the application unless there is hardship to the tenant.

19. The tenant has made an application for hardship, explaining that she is in receipt of [NAME]. The Respondent, having followed the tenant’s face book page etc, asserts that because there is some evidence that she is working, she is not somehow suffering hardship.

20. The Tribunal are satisfied that a [NAME] claim by its nature, is an indication of hardship, and therefore the effective date of the rent increase is the date of the decision, that is 1st July 2021.

D. Brandler

Name: Tribunal Judge Brandler Date: 15th July 2021

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the [NAME] within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

THE LEGISLATION Housing Act 1988 s.13.— Increases of rent under assured periodic tenancies. (1) This section applies to— (a) a statutory periodic tenancy other than one which, by virtue of paragraph 11 or paragraph 12 in Part I of Schedule 1 to this Act, cannot for the time being be an assured tenancy; and (b) any other periodic tenancy which is an assured tenancy, other than one in relation to which there is a provision, for the time being binding on the tenant, under which the rent for a particular period of the tenancy will or may be greater than the rent for an earlier period. (2) For the purpose of securing an increase in the rent under a tenancy to which this section applies, the landlord may serve on the tenant a notice in the prescribed form proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy specified in the notice, being a period beginning not earlier than— (a) the minimum period after the date of the service of the notice; and (b) except in the case of a statutory periodic [tenancy—] [ (i) in the case of an assured agricultural occupancy, the first anniversary of the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; (ii) in any other case, on the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; and ] (c) if the rent under the tenancy has previously been increased by virtue of a notice under this subsection or a determination under section 14[below—] [ (i) in the case of an assured agricultural occupancy, the first anniversary of the date on which the increased rent took effect; (ii) in any other case, the appropriate date. ] (3) The minimum period referred to in subsection (2) above is— (a) in the case of a yearly tenancy, six months; (b) in the case of a tenancy where the period is less than a month, one month; and (c) in any other case, a period equal to the period of the tenancy. [ (3A) The appropriate date referred to in subsection (2)(c)(ii) above is— (a) in a case to which subsection (3B) below applies, the date that falls 53 weeks after the date on which the increased rent took effect; (b) in any other case, the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the increased rent took effect. (3B) This subsection applies where— (a) the rent under the tenancy has been increased by virtue of a notice under this section or a determination under section 14 below on at least one occasion after the coming into force of the Regulatory Reform (Assured Periodic Tenancies) (Rent Increases) Order 2003; and

(b) the fifty-third week after the date on which the last such increase took effect begins more than six days before the anniversary of the date on which the first such increase took effect. ] (4) Where a notice is served under subsection (2) above, a new rent specified in the notice shall take effect as mentioned in the notice unless, before the beginning of the new period specified in the notice,— (a) the tenant by an application in the prescribed form refers the notice to [the appropriate tribunal] ; or (b) the landlord and the tenant agree on a variation of the rent which is different from that proposed in the notice or agree that the rent should not be varied. (5) Nothing in this section (or in section 14 below) affects the right of the landlord and the tenant under an assured tenancy to vary by agreement any term of the tenancy (including a term relating to rent).

s.14.— Determination of rent by [tribunal] . (1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to [the appropriate tribunal] a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the [appropriate tribunal]3 shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the [appropriate tribunal]3 consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and

(b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. [ (3A) In making a determination under this section in any case where under Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 the landlord or a superior landlord is liable to pay council tax in respect of a hereditament (“the relevant hereditament”) of which the dwelling-house forms part, the [appropriate tribunal] shall have regard to the amount of council tax which, as at the date on which the notice under section 13(2) above was served, was set by the billing authority— (a) for the financial year in which that notice was served, and (b) for the category of dwellings within which the relevant hereditament fell on that date, but any discount or other reduction affecting the amount of council tax payable shall be disregarded. (3B) In subsection (3A) above— (a) “hereditament” means a dwelling within the meaning of Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, (b) “billing authority” has the same meaning as in that Part of that Act, and (c) “category of dwellings” has the same meaning as in section 30(1) and (2) of that Act. (4) In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 , but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture [, in respect of council tax] or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements. (5) Where any rates in respect of the dwelling-house concerned are borne by the landlord or a superior landlord, the [appropriate tribunal] shall make their determination under this section as if the rates were not so borne. (6) In any case where— (a) [the appropriate tribunal] have before them at the same time the reference of a notice under section 6(2) above relating to a tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 6 reference”) and the reference of a notice under section 13(2) above relating to the same tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 13 reference”), and (b) the date specified in the notice under section 6(2) above is not later than the first day of the new period specified in the notice under section 13(2) above, and (c) the [appropriate tribunal]9 propose to hear the two references together, the [appropriate tribunal] shall make a determination in relation to the section 6 reference before making their determination in relation to the section 13 reference and, accordingly, in such a case the reference in subsection (1)(c) above to the terms of the tenancy to which the notice relates shall be construed as a reference to those terms as varied by virtue of the determination made in relation to the section 6 reference. (7) Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to [the appropriate tribunal] , then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by [the appropriate tribunal] (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the

tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to [the appropriate tribunal] that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the committee may direct. (8) Nothing in this section requires [the appropriate tribunal] to continue with their determination of a rent for a dwelling-house if the landlord and tenant give notice in writing that they no longer require such a determination or if the tenancy has come to an end. (9) This section shall apply in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy as if in subsection (1) the reference to an assured tenancy were a reference to an assured shorthold tenancy.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the market rent for the property to be £1250.00 per calendar month.
  • The tribunal considered the property would be worth £1300.00 per month in a fully modernised condition.
  • A deduction of £50 per month was applied for decorations to reach the final rent.
  • The tenant's claim of receiving Universal Credit was accepted as an indication of hardship.
  • The effective date for the rent increase was set as the date of the decision, 1st July 2021, due to tenant hardship.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's assertion that the property was let at a reduced rate due to an employer/employee relationship was rejected.
  • The landlord's allegations of damage caused by the tenant were dismissed.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal determined the market rent for a property under an assured tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, considering the condition of the property and ignoring any improvements made by the tenant.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the disregard of tenant improvements.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower market rent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation could benefit from a tribunal review if they believe the rent is too high.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence regarding the condition of the property and the terms of the tenancy agreement mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.