VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered factors such as the condition of the property and the responsibilities of both the landlord and tenant.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair determination of rent under an assured periodic tenancy.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination takes into account the nature of the tenancy and any improvements or conditions affecting the property.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The decision took into account the nature of the premises and the responsibilities of both the landlord and tenant.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AC/MNR/2021/0015

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge [NAME]

Landlord [NAME] 7 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 800 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 29 October 2020

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable NIL Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 29 February 2012

6. Length of the term or rental period 6 months

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord responsible for all repairs

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Yes

9. Description of premises Self- contained studio apartment forming an Annexe to landlords’ own house, comprising one room, kitchen and bathroom.

Chairman Judge F J Silverman Date of Decision 12 May 2021

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair determination of rent under an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The market rental value considers the property's age, location, and state of repair.
  • The rent is assessed under the Housing Act 1988, specifically Section 14.
  • The rent determination reflects the property's unmodernized condition.
  • The rent is adjusted based on the property's characteristics and location.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

They considered the nature of the premises and the responsibilities of both parties.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The nature of the premises and the responsibilities of both parties.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

For the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the same factors when determining rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Details of the premises and the responsibilities of both parties.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.