Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Periodic Tenancy Under Housing Act
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for a periodic tenancy. They took into account the open market value of the property and adjusted it based on the condition and terms of the tenancy.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the open market value of the property, adjusted for the condition and terms of the tenancy.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar periodic tenancy in the open market, considering the condition and terms of the existing tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for a periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The Tribunal considered the open market value of the property and adjusted it for the condition and terms of the tenancy.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00AE/MNR/2021/0180
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME], 14 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 300.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 25 November 2021
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 2017
6. Length of the term or rental period Weekly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord major and external repairs and decoration, tenant minor internal repairs and decoration
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None.
9. Description of premises Ground floor flat in three storey semi detached house comprising three rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc.
Chairman E [NAME] of Decision 2 February 2022
1
Case Reference : JM/LON/00AE/MNR/2021/0180
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : 13 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 22 November 2021
Type of Application : Determination of the market rent under Section 14 Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 2 February 2022 Determination
remote hearing on the papers.
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
The market rent as at 25 November 2021 is £300 per week.
This has been a remote hearing which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined in a remote hearing. The documents that the Tribunal were referred to are in an electronic bundle, the contents of which have been noted. The order made is described below.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background
1. On 22 November 2021, the tenant referred to the Tribunal a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
2. The landlord's notice, which was dated 20 October 2021 proposed a rent of £360 per week with effect from 25 November 2021.
3. The tenancy is a periodic tenancy by succession which commenced in 2017 on the death of the tenant’s father.
4. Directions were issued by the tribunal on 7 December 2021.
5. The parties did not object to the matter being dealt with on the papers and both made representations to the tribunal.
The Evidence
6. The landlord stated that the flat is on the ground floor of a three storey semi detached house. The accommodation which comprises three rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc is double glazed. The tenant has the use of the rear garden which has double gates and could be used as off street parking.
7. The landlord stated that he had installed electric eco digital panel heaters in the flat in November 2020 following a Notice from the local authority.
8. He was of the opinion that garden flats commanded a premium of 10% over flats without open space. He referred to eight flats available on the open market with rent in the range of £400 - £650 per week. He was of the opinion that15% should be deducted from the open market rent to reflect the condition of the flat: the proposed rent of £360 per week is reasonable.
9. The tenant stated that the is no heating in the kitchen, bathroom or hallway. There is damp in the main bedroom, kitchen and bathroom. The second bedroom is small and can only be considered as a single room. The carpets, curtains and white goods are the tenants.
10. The rear yard could only be used to park a very small car as the double gates open inwards, otherwise the area would not be secure.
The Accommodation
11. The Tribunal viewed the locality via google maps and associated programmes.
12. The house is situated within a heavily parked one way street of similar houses situated in the area known as the Haringay ladder.
3 13. It is accepted by the parties that the house is not in the condition of most flats available to let on the open market.
The law
14. In accordance with the terms of section 14 Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal proceeded to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
15. In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(1), ignored the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act.
Valuation
16. In coming to its decision, I had regard to the evidence supplied by both the landlord and the tenant. The comparables were mainly superior in terms of modernisation to the subject premises and generally benefited from white goods, floor coverings and blinds or curtains. The comparables were all in good repair, including some which were newly refurbished and others which had been extended.
17. I concluded that the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market would be £425 per week which is the figure the landlord must have used to arrive at the rent of £360 per week. The open market assumes that the flat is in the condition usually found in open market lettings. However, this flat requires updating: the kitchen is basic, the bathroom dated, the panel heaters have not been installed throughout the flat and there is some dampness and the carpets, curtains and white goods are the tenants.
18. I have deducted £125 from the open market rent to reflect these matters together with the terms of the tenancy since the tenant has more onerous obligations in terms of being responsible for minor internal repairs and internal decorations than is the norm under an Assured Shorthold letting.
. The decision
19. The rent of £300 per week will take effect from 25 November 2021 in accordance with the landlord’s notice
Chairman: [NAME]: 2 February 2022
__________________________________
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
i. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made
4 to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
ii. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
iii. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
iv. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
Appendix Housing Act 1988
14 Determination of rent by rent assessment committee. (1)Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d )in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement—
5 (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3)For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. (4)In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements…. (7)Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal … shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.
6
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £890.00 Monthly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: Open Market Value Adjusted
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal considered that the property required updating, including a basic kitchen and dated bathroom.
- The Tribunal noted that panel heaters had not been installed throughout the flat.
- The Tribunal found that there was some dampness in the property.
- The Tribunal deducted £125 from the open market rent due to the property's condition and the tenant's more onerous repair obligations.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the market rent for a periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in a dispute over rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the open market value of the property, adjusted for the condition and terms of the tenancy.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied, specifically section 14.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the terms of the tenancy.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting the rent at £300 per week.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition and terms of their tenancy when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence regarding the condition of the property and the terms of the tenancy were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
