Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £1,210 per month after considering the property's condition and market value.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the open market value adjusted for the property's condition and tenancy terms.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. The determination considers the property's condition and the terms of the existing tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and the property's state.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,210 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and market value.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00BA/MNR/2023/0447
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 455 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord [APPELLANT] 525 Esplanade, Urangan, Qld, 4655
Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1210.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 19th March 2024
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable 0.00 Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced Second Succession
6. Length of the term or rental period Unknown
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises A 1930’s-built end of terrace house located in established road. Accommodation comprises: three bedrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen, bathroom/wc, rear garden
[NAME] of Decision 19th March 2024
1
Case Reference
: LON/OOBA/MNR/2033/0447
Property : 455 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mrs [COUNSEL]
Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] : Mr [COUNSEL] of Application : 29 October 2023
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 19th March 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1210 per calendar month with effect from 19th March 2024. ___________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. On the 21 September 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,700 per month in place of the existing rent of £504 per month to take effect from 3 November 2023. On the evidence available to the Tribunal it would appear that, for the period since the tenant succeeded to the tenancy in 1994,the rent has been set by the Rent Officer under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.,
2. On the 29 October 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. As such, the Tribunal’s jurisdiction is limited to such a determination. The decision set out below should not be regarded as a definitive statement in relation any issue concerning the current status of the tenancy for the purposes of controlling rent increases. Should that issue be contested, it is a matter for the County Court.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal inspected the property on the 19 March 2024 in the presence of the Tenant, Mrs [APPELLANT] together with her son and daughter.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal has had consideration to the inspection and the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.
Determination and Valuation
5. Having consideration of our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the Morden area, we consider that the open market rent for the property if it were in good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom, double glazing, modern services, carpets and curtains and white goods supplied by the landlord would be £2,200 per month. Using our own expertise, we considered that deductions of 45% should applied to take into account the terms of the tenancy, and the actual current condition of the property as seen on inspection. This provides a deduction of £990 per month from the hypothetical rent. This reduces the figure to £1,210 per month.
It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.
6. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,210 per calendar month.
Decision
3
7. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £1,210 per calendar month.
8. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,210 to take effect on the 19 March 2024. This, being the date of the Tribunal’s decision. The Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship due to age and the significant increase in rental value.
Chairman: [NAME]: 19 March 2024
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Periodic Tenancy Under Housing Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: Open Market Value Adjusted
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The court allows rent determinations that reflect the open market value of the property.
- Adjustments for the property's condition are considered in favor of the tenant.
- Specific conditions of the tenancy are taken into account in determining rent.
- Terms of the tenancy agreement influence the decision in favor of the tenant.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new rent of £1,210 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and landlord were involved in the dispute over rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and market value, adjusting for the tenancy terms.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the adjustment for the property's condition and the terms of the tenancy.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the property's condition and market value when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included the property inspection and written submissions from both parties.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
