VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a new rent of £825.00 per month for an assured periodic tenancy after the landlord proposed an increase from £750.00 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant may refer a landlord's rent increase notice to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. This includes challenging a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine a new rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a new rent of £825.00 per month for an assured periodic tenancy after considering the landlord's notice under the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BC/MNR/2025/0640

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 51 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

R [NAME]

Landlord [COMPANY] 6 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 825.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 January 2025

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable n/a Per n/a

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 06 January 2023

6. Length of the term or rental period 3 months

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord external structural

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none

9. Description of premises One room within a shared house.

Chairman R Waterhouse FRICS Date of Decision 15 May 2025

(c)

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00BC/MNR/2025/0640 Property : Room in 51 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : Ms [APPELLANT] Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] and venue of Consideration : Hearing at [ADDRESS] Offices with later inspection. Date of Summary Reasons : 15 May 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £825.00 per calendar month with effect from 1 January 2025. ____________________________________

Full REASONS

Background 1. On 20 November 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £825.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £750.00 per month to take effect from 1 January 2025.

2. On 17 December 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

(c)

2

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did inspect the property. The property the subject of the tenancy comprises a room within a shared house. The room has fitted wardrobes, a double bed and mattress supplied by the landlord. The tenant has additional furniture, the room has windows which overlook the garden, the windows are double glazed. The room has central heating supplied by a radiator from a boiler that supplies the house. Beyond the room, there is a bathroom and WC on the landing. The room is contained in house consisting of ground, first and second floors. There are seven letting rooms, in total and bathrooms on each floor.

Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. These have been considered in full, and the details not replicated within the tribunal decision in detail.

The tenant supplied as completed Reply Form requesting an inspection and a hearing. The form identified the property as one room within a shared house. The house has three bathrooms and a kitchen which are shared with the other occupants.

The Hearing 5. The hearing was attended by [APPELLANT] for the landlord. The tenant was absent for the hearing.

6. The tribunal had reference to Rule 34 with the absence of the tenant. The tribunal considered and determined that the absent party had been notified and that it was in the interests of justice to proceed with the hearing.

Landlord Respondent Submissions

7. The landlord representative reiterated her written submissions. In addition, it was noted by the Respondent that the comparables supplied by the tenant were generally in different postcode areas and that in her view the localities were not so well provided compared with the area the subject property was within.

Determination and Valuation 8. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £825.00 per calendar month. The tribunal does not consider any alteration from this to be warranted.

9. The full valuation is shown below:

(c)

3 Market Rent

£825.00 per calendar month

Less List any deductions

10. The Tribunal determines a rent of £825.00 per calendar month.

Decision 11. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £825.00 per calendar month.

12. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £825.00 to take effect on 1 January. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

Chairman: R Waterhouse FRICS Date: 15 May 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant can challenge a landlord’s rent increase notice.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on the property's condition and location.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent reduction if the property's condition significantly affects its market value.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on improvements made by the tenant.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new rent of £825.00 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988 and determined that the new rent was reasonable for the open market.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's rental value with similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can refer a landlord's rent increase notice to the Tribunal for a fair determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included the landlord's notice, the tenant's response, and the inspection of the property.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but the process and grounds for appeal depend on the specific circumstances.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.