Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a new rent of £550 per month for an assured periodic tenancy after considering the property's condition and market comparables. The decision followed a tenant's referral under the Housing Act 1988.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant may refer a landlord's notice of rent increase to the First-tier Tribunal for determination of a fair market rent.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal can also consider a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When making a determination, the tribunal will disregard certain factors such as the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant, increases in the value of the property due to improvements made by the tenant, and reductions in the value due to the tenant's non-compliance with the terms of the tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a new market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a market rent of £550 per month for an assured periodic tenancy following a tenant's referral under the Housing Act 1988. The Tribunal considered the property's condition and market comparables to set the rent.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HH/MNR/2021/0137
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 76a [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 63 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 550.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 10 December 2021
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 10 November 2011
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord
8. Description of premises Ground floor 2 bedroom flat.
[NAME] of Decision 7 April 2022
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00HH/MNR/2021/0137 Property :
76a [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] :
[NAME]
Tenant : Mrs [COUNSEL] C [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent Sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :
7th April 2022
DECISION
CHI/00HH/MNR/2021/0137 2 Summary of Decision
1. On 7th April 2022 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £550 per month to take effect from 10th December 2021.
Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to Sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.
3. On 25th October 2021 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £600 per month in place of the existing rent of £495 per month, to take effect from 10th December 2021. The notice complied with the legal requirements.
4. The Tribunal received an application dated 14th November 2021 from the Tenant under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.
5. The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.
6. The Tribunal issued directions on 14th February 2022 informing the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations and that the Tribunal would seek to view the property on the internet. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.
7. The Tenant submitted papers which had been copied to the Landlord.
8. As stated in the Directions, as no objection was received from either party, the Tribunal determined the case on 7th April 2022 without an oral hearing. The Property 9. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet the property comprises a ground floor flat in a converted end terraced property of three units. It is situated on a busy road within a mainly residential area approximately 1/2 mile from the seafront.
10. There are a number of local shops within reasonable distance and a wider range of amenities within the Torbay area.
11. The accommodation is described as a Living Room, Kitchen, two Bedrooms and a Bathroom with WC. There is off-road parking, a small Courtyard, gas-fired central heating, double glazed windows and was let with fitted carpets and curtains. The current Energy Performance Certificate rating is ‘C’.
CHI/00HH/MNR/2021/0137 3 Submissions 12. The initial tenancy began on 10th November 2011. The present rent of £495 per month is shown in the tenancy agreement dated 10th August 2014 supplied to the Tribunal.
13. The Tenant states that a cooker is provided but no fridge or washing machine, and that the carpets are worn. She also refers to several repair issues including damp, defects to the roof and rainwater goods and poor kitchen units.
14. The Tenant also refers to problems with the electrical installation and submitted a Domestic Electrical Installation Condition report based on an inspection dated 24th August 2021. This includes several recommendations, one of which is described as potentially dangerous and requiring Urgent remedial action.
15. An invoice dated 3rd November 2021 is submitted which states that “[NAME] seems to be the cause of the readings (low insulation resistance readings to circuits)”.
16. No submissions or observations were received from either the Landlord or his Agent. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal (1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy- (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded- (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement-
CHI/00HH/MNR/2021/0137 4 (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his [NAME], or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his [NAME] being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.
Consideration and Valuation 17. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
18. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue.
19. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgment and knowledge of rental values in the Torbay area, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £725 per month.
20. However, the property is not in a condition that would command such a rent and adjustments need to be made to this ‘open market’ rent to take account of the Tenant’s provision of some white goods, general
CHI/00HH/MNR/2021/0137 5 dampness and disrepair, worn carpets and the condition of the electrical installation. 21. Using its experience, the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments per month should be made: Tenant’s provision of some white goods £20 Worn carpets £30 Dampness and general disrepair as above £95 Shortcomings to electrical installation £30
____ TOTAL £175
22. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination
23. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £550 per month. 24. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £550 per month should take effect from 10th December 2021, this being the date specified in the notice.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide
CHI/00HH/MNR/2021/0137 6 whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Ground Floor Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets new rent for assured periodic tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property in Poor Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £725 Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property in Totnes
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent should be set at a fair market rate.
- The condition of the property must be considered.
- Comparable properties in the area should be taken into account.
- Specific conditions and responsibilities related to the property should be factored in.
- Certain costs should be excluded from the calculation.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal set a new rent of £550 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant referred the landlord's notice of rent increase to the First-tier Tribunal.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal determined the rent based on written representations and internet property views, considering the property's condition and market comparables.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied to determine the market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its comparability to market rents.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can refer a landlord's notice of rent increase to the First-tier Tribunal for a fair market rent determination.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included the tenancy agreement, property descriptions, and condition reports.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) if they obtain permission from the First-tier Tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for assistance with such cases.
