Tribunal Sets New Rent for Intermediate Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) set a new rent of £1,085 per month for an intermediate tenancy starting in April 2026. This decision reflects the local market rate adjusted for specific amenities provided by the landlord.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent adjusted according to the statutory provisions of the Housing Act 1988 when a landlord proposes an increase in an intermediate market rent.
📖 What the law says
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent. The notice must specify a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period, which must begin at least two months after the notice is served. Additionally, if the rent has been previously increased, the next increase can only occur after a specific period, which varies depending on the type of tenancy.
A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided that the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on various factors including the terms of the existing tenancy and any notices given under Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an intermediate tenancy, adjusting it based on provided amenities and local market rates.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the market rent at £1,085 per calendar month with effect from April 2026. The decision was based on local market rates and adjustments for amenities provided by the landlord.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference HAV/29UG/MNR/2026/0071 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tenant [NAME] Tenant’s Representative Mrs [COUNSEL] Landlord [COMPANY] Landlord’s [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Landlords’ Representatives Ms [NAME] & Ms [NAME], [COMPANY] of Application 20 April 2026 Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent, sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members [NAME] – [NAME] of Decision 16 June 2026 Rent Determined £1,085 per Calendar Month Intermediate Market Rent £868 per Calendar Month Date the new rent takes effect 8 April 2026
2
REASONS FOR THE
DECISION Background 1. On 2 February 2026 [COMPANY] (‘[NAME]’), the landlord, served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 (‘the 1988 Act’) which proposed a new rent of £869.60p per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £786.40p to take effect from 8 April 2026.
2. In their covering letter to Mr [APPELLANT] (the tenant) dated 2 February 2026, [APPELLANT] explain that the rent applicable to the property is an ‘intermediate market rent’, which is calculated at 80% of the corresponding market rent.
Accordingly, the proposed new rent of £869.60p is calculated by applying 80% to a market rent of £1,087.00p per calendar month.
3. On 20 April 2026 (received by the Tribunal on 22 April 2026), under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, Mr [RESPONDENT] referred the landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
4. The landlord is required to have sent their reply and evidence (their form Rents 1A) to the Tribunal within 28 days. Correspondingly, the tenant is required to have sent his reply to the landlord’s case (his form Rents 1B) to the Tribunal within 14 days of receipt of the same.
5. The assured tenancy provided to the Tribunal is for a fixed term of six months commencing 8 September 2017. The rental period is monthly, payable in advance on the first day of every month. Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.
6. Repairs – at clause (5.2) of the agreement, the tenant covenants to keep the interior of the property and contents in at least as good and clean condition and repair as they were at the commencement of the tenancy, with fair wear and tear excepted, and to keep the property reasonably aired and warmed.
7. At paragraph 4 of the General Notes it says, ‘section 11, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) – these obligations require the landlord to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling, and to keep in repair and proper working order the installations for the supply of water, gas and electricity and the installations in the property for space heating and hot water.
8. In short, section 11 of the 1985 Act applies to the tenancy.
3 Services or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtains and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.
9. Mr [NAME] has confirmed that neither are there any services provided by the landlord under the tenancy, nor is there any furniture provided too. Liability for Council Tax 10. The tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax. Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.
11. None that have a material effect on the market rent. Inspection/Hearing 12. The parties have requested neither an oral hearing, nor an inspection of the property.
Accordingly, the Tribunal has considered this case on the bases of the papers provided by the parties, which includes various photographs, the Tribunal having viewed the property on the internet and its own knowledge and specialist expertise. The Property 13. In his application Mr [NAME] describes the property as a second floor flat, with accommodation to comprise: reception room with open plan kitchen, one bedroom and one bathroom/WC.
14. From the photographs provided, [ADDRESS] is of traditional brick construction with a pitch tiled roof.
15. In their Rents 1A form, the landlord agrees with the tenant’s description of the property. 16. [ADDRESS] is to the north of the A2, just to the south of Sawyer’s Lake. Evidence 17. Whereas Mr [NAME] has not submitted a Statement (Rents 1B reply), he has given submissions in his Rents 1 form in which he says he has been assisted by Mrs [NAME]. Ms [RESPONDENT] and Ms [RESPONDENT] have submitted the landlord’s Rents 1A form dated 21 May 2026, albeit it has been signed by Ms [APPELLANT] only.
4 The Tenant – Mr [APPELLANT]
18. Under section 5 – Details of your tenancy, Mr [NAME] says: (1) his current rent is £786.40p per month, (2) the rent payable includes neither Council tax, nor any charges for utilities, and (3) the tenancy commenced on 8 September 2017. Mr [APPELLANT] goes on to confirm that neither he, nor any former tenant have carried out improvements for which they were not responsible under the terms of the tenancy.
19. Mr [NAME] says the market rent payable is not more than £824.00 per month.
20. Mr [NAME] has provided the Tribunal with details from [NAME] which says, ‘Social landlords in England including Housing Associations like The [NAME] Group, are permitted to increase social rent by up to 4.8% for the 2026-27 financial year…’ 21. The Tribunal understands that to increase the current rent payable of £786.40p per month by 4.8% is to equal £824.15p per month, say £824.00p per month, which is the sum Mr [NAME] says the rent payable is not more than.
22. The extracts from [NAME] include a paragraph headed ‘Rent Types’, which says, ‘While social rents are capped, other types like intermediate market rent (IMR) may have different, often higher, increases.’ 23. From the photographs provided, coupled with Mr [NAME] application, the Tribunal understands the property has central heating, double glazing, blinds and a fully fitted kitchen with a cooker and a refrigerator having been provided by the landlord.
24. Mr [RESPONDENT] concludes to say the proposed new rent is an increase of 9.56%, and the Government recommends an increase of no higher than 4.8%. The landlord – Ms [RESPONDENT] and Ms [RESPONDENT]
25. In their letter to Mr [NAME] to accompany the notice proposing the new rent dated 2 February 2026, [NAME] say the new monthly rent charges for the year 2026/27 will be £869.60p. [NAME] go on to say, ‘The intermediate market rent value for your property is 80% of market rent, which is based on the average local market rate for the type of property you rent.’ 26. In their Rents 1A form, the landlord says, (1) they served the section 13 rent increase notice referred to the Tribunal by the tenant, (2) they agree the details of the tenancy given by the tenant, (3) they agree the details of the property and
5 the tenancy agreement given by the tenant in his application form, (4) they do not agree to the rent proposed by the tenant, and (5) they wish to charge the rent proposed in their notice.
27. Thereafter the landlord sets out their valuation evidence and says, (1) Rents are set in line with government legislation, the tenancy is an intermediate Market Rent therefore based off the market rents for similar properties in the area, (2) [NAME] use two independent companies called [NAME] and [NAME], to gather the information on Market Rents for all [NAME] properties, (3) [NAME] gather the information in October to enable setting the rents for the following April, In this instance October 2025 values to set the April 2026 rents. We use the average figure given between the two to ensure it is a fair and reasonable figure, and (4) Attached are the output files for this property showing the Market Rent values at this time.’ 28. The Tribunal have been provided with two screenshots for the property, in outline as follows: (1) [NAME], valuation date 17 October 2025, one bedroom flat, intermediate rent, market rent - £993 (which the Tribunal understands to be per calendar month), and (2) [NAME], property type – F, one bedroom, Rental AVM - £1,181 (again, which the Tribunal understands to be per calendar month). Determination and Valuation 29. The Tribunal has read all the contents of the bundle (the papers), but it limits its discussion and considerations to those points relevant to reach its determination.
30. Whereas Mr [NAME] has not provided the Tribunal with replies in a Rents 1B form, he has provided submissions in his application with accompanying photographs and screenshots of information from [NAME]. Mr [NAME] has not provided valuation evidence per se but says it is no more than £824 pcm.
31. Ms [RESPONDENT] and Ms [RESPONDENT] have given submissions for the landlord in their Rents 1A form and [NAME] have given further information in their letter to Mr [NAME] dated 2 February 2026.
32. From the information provided by [NAME], the rent payable by Mr [NAME] is an ‘intermediate rent’, to which the statutory cap of an increase of 4.8% on the current rent payable for 2026/27 does not apply. 33. [NAME] valuation evidence for the market rent is provided by [NAME] and [NAME] and is as at a valuation date in October 2025. The average of the two market rents provided (£993 pcm and £1,181 pcm) is £1,087 per calendar month, which in turn has been adopted by [NAME] to be the market rent for their notice of
6 proposed increase in intermediate rent payable. The Tribunal has not been provided with any information on the properties which go to make up the two market rents that result from [NAME]’s and [NAME]’s respective analyses.
34. The valuation date for the market rent is 8 April 2026. Taking into consideration the valuation evidence and submissions on market rent of the parties and applying its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines the market rent of the subject property modernised, in good order, unfurnished to be £1,125 per calendar month. That is the rent we would expect the property to let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as comparable properties in the area having White Goods, central heating, double glazing, carpets and curtains provided by the landlord.
35. From Mr [RESPONDENT] submissions and the landlord’s agreement of the details given by the tenant on their tenancy in their Rents 1A form, the Tribunal has determined adjustments to the market rent are required to reflect that the landlord has provided neither curtains, nor a washing machine.
36. The Tribunal has made adjustments to its determination of the market rent with respect to the following: a) No curtains are provided under the tenancy, and b) Of the White Goods, a washing machine has not been provided by the landlord.
37. The Tribunal’s valuation is as follows: Starting Rent £1,125 pcm Less a) No provision of curtains - £25 pcm b) No provision of a washing machine - £15 pcm £40 pcm Market rent £1,085 pcm Undue Hardship 38. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.
39. Mr [NAME] says he works as a labourer in construction and that he does not receive sick pay, so this increase along with all other utilities will be very hard for him.
7 40. In section 2.8 of their Rents 1A form, the landlord gives no submissions in reply to Mr [RESPONDENT] submission on hardship.
41. It is the Tribunal’s understanding that our decision will result in the increase of rent from the current intermediate rent payable of £786.40p by £81.60p per month, up to the intermediate rent of £868 per month, an increase of 10.4%. On the bases of Mr [NAME] limited submissions, the Tribunal has determined the increase in his intermediate rent will not cause him undue hardship and the starting date for the new rent is to be that stated in the landlord’s notice – 8 April 2026. Decision 42. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £1,085 (One Thousand and Eighty-Five Pounds) per calendar month with effect from 8 April 2026.
43. From the information provided by [NAME], the intermediate rent payable is 80% of the market rent of £1,085 pcm, to equal £868 pcm. APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £725 PCM for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rental Rate for Tenant's Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rental Rate for Manchester Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Manchester Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,250 PCM
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £900 pcm
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent should be set at a fair market value based on comparable properties.
- The rent adjustment must consider the property's condition.
- Evidence of comparable properties' rental values supports a fair market rent determination.
- A tenant is entitled to a fair determination of market rent under sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
- The rent must be assessed against comparable rental values in the area, considering any utilities provided by the landlord.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The proposed rent increase does not align with current market rates.
- The proposed rent increase causes undue hardship to the tenant.
- The rent increase is not supported by evidence of comparable properties' rental values.
- The proposed rent increase does not reflect the current market value adjusted for specific property conditions.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new rent of £1,085 per month for an intermediate tenancy starting in April 2026.
Who was involved?
A tenant and their landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal decided based on local market rates and adjustments for amenities provided by the landlord.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied in determining the rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The local market rate and adjustments for amenities provided by the landlord were central to the decision.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant, as it set a higher rent than proposed initially.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider local market rates and provided amenities when challenging rent increases.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included local market rate information from independent companies like Hometrack and Rightmove, as well as details of the tenancy agreement.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
