VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets New Rent of £405.60 Per Week for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the property's condition and local rental values, setting a new rent of £405.60 per week.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and local rental values.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancymarket rent assessment

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this rule, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on the property's condition and local rental values. The application cannot be made if the rent is already determined by a previous decision under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent based on the property's condition and comparable market values.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the property's condition and local rental values, setting a new rent of £405.60 per week.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. GB/LON/00AP/MNR/2024/0190

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 27 [ADDRESS] , [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [NAME] [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £

Per

(excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is:

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced

6. Length of the term or rental period Statutory Tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A Victorian mid terrace house with rear garden. Accommodation comprises three bedrooms, living room, kitchen, bathroom.

[NAME] of Decision 19th September 2024

1

Case Reference

: LON/OOAP/MNR/2024/0190

Property : 27 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant : Ms [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 18h March 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 19th September 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £405.60 per calendar Week with effect from 1 April 2024. ___________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. On the 20 February 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £188.87 per week in place of the existing rent of £175.37 per week to take effect from 1st April 2024. The Tribunal were provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement which commenced on the 20 December 2010.

2. On the 18th March 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Evidence

3. Following Directions prepared by the Tribunal on the 17th July 2024. The parties completed the Reply Forms.

Determination and Valuation

4. Having consideration of our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the Tottenham area, we consider that the open market rent for the property if it were in good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom, modern services, carpets and curtains and white goods supplied by the landlord would be £507 per week

5. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: mould to some rooms, no white goods, no carpets or curtains and dated kitchen units, which equates to approximately 20% (£101.40)

Decision

6. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £405.60 per calendar week.

7.The Tribunal directs the new rent of £405.60 per week to take effect on the 1st April 2024. This, being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase and the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would not cause the tenant undue hardship.

3 8. It is often the case that market rents are in excess of those that maybe charged by social landlord’s as it is a significant part of their remit to provide affordable housing. As such depending on the type of tenancy agreement their calculation of rent is either at a percentage of market rent or by way of index. Comparison is made with the open market rather than limited to other properties which are offered by social housing providers. It is assumed that the landlord will by usual convention of social landlord’s not seek to increase the rent proposed in its original notice as a result of this determination. Chairman: [NAME]: 19 September 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property's condition significantly affects the fair market rent.
  • Local rental values are used to adjust the rent.
  • Rent adjustments must reflect the open market value.
  • Comparisons with similar properties in the area are considered.
  • The tribunal determines the fair market rent based on provided evidence.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new rent of £405.60 per week for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and local rental values.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its comparison to local rental values.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and local rental values.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and evidence regarding the property's condition and local rental values mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.