Tribunal Sets Rent and Terms for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on the rent and conditions for an assured periodic tenancy, including the type of furniture provided and the shared facilities available to the tenant.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have the rent and terms of their assured periodic tenancy set by the Tribunal.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal can then set the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The application cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent and conditions for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent and terms for an assured periodic tenancy, including furniture provided and shared facilities, based on the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CG/MNR/2025/0819 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Judge Richard Dobson-Mason & [COMPANY] [NAME], 380 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 625.00 Per calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 12 June 2025 *3. The amount included for services is not applicable Per 4. Date assured tenancy commenced 12 December 2020 5. Length of the term or rental period 3 months 6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per the tenancy agreement of 11 December 2020 and s. 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord 1 bed, 2 tables, 1 sofa, 1 wardrobe, 2 chests of drawers & bedside tables
MR22 8. Description of premises The property is an attic room located on the second floor of a brick built mid- terraced house beneath a slate roof. Accommodation comprises: bedroom, shower/WC and store cupboard. Shared facilities include: kitchen located in basement area with natural light with storage and kitchen facilities (3 fridges), and washing machine and dryer. Utilities included: council tax, water, electricity, gas & internet / TV package. Chairman Judge Richard Dobson-Mason Date of Decision 22.08.25
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Rejects Landlord's Request for Increased Rent
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Based on Market Conditions and Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to have their rent set by the Tribunal under the Housing Act 1988.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and necessary improvements.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on comparable properties in the area.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on market conditions and the state of repair of the property.
- The tenant is entitled to have the rent for their assured periodic tenancy set by the Tribunal, taking into account the condition of the property.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the rent and terms for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which governs assured periodic tenancies.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument centered around the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent and terms.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for guidance on rent and tenancy terms.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The tenancy agreement and the specifics of the property were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can often be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.