VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Rent at £1,950 PCM for Assured Tenancy in Tottenham

Case No.

📌 In brief

A tenant requested a determination of their rent after receiving a notice proposing a significant increase from their landlord. After reviewing evidence on property condition and local rental prices, the Tribunal set the new rent at £1,950 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a fair market value after considering a person's condition and other relevant factors under Sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancyrent controlproperty valuation

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent. The notice must specify a new period for the tenancy starting at least two months after the notice is served. Additionally, if the rent has been previously increased under this section, further increases can be proposed after specific timeframes, which vary based on the type of tenancy.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided that the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy. The tribunal then determines the open-market rent, considering the terms of the existing tenancy and disregarding certain factors like improvements made by the tenant.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy in Tottenham, considering various factors including property condition and comparable rental values.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy, considering property condition and comparable rental values. The new rent is £1,950 per calendar month.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference LON/00AP/MNR/2026/0116 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant [NAME] Tenant’s Representative None Landlord [COUNSEL] Landlord’s [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Landlord’s Representative None Date of Application 11 February 2025 Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Decision 19 May 2026 Rent Determined £1,950 per calendar month Date the new rent takes effect 23 February 2026.

2

REASONS FOR THE

DECISION Background 1. On 22 December 2025, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,500 per calendar month(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1,300 per month to take effect from 23 February 2026. This being an increase of £1,200.

2. On 11 February 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. It is stated that the assured tenancy commenced on the 9 June 2011, The Tribunal were presented with a copy of the agreement at an initial passing rent of £278.92 per week. The tenancy was for a term of 12 months; therefore, this is a statutory tenancy agreement. Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.

4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord:

5. Three wardrobes were provided by the Landlord 6. No service charges. Liability for Council Tax 7. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of [NAME]. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax. Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.

8. It is assumed; there are none.

3 Inspection/Hearing 9. The tenant requested inspection. On the 7 April 2026, Judge Westby confirmed in Directions that an inspection was not necessary nor proportionate, given the extensive photographic evidence provided.

10. The Tribunal has therefore, considered this case on the basis of the papers, together with the papers provided by the parties, [NAME], and its own knowledge and specialist expertise. [NAME] 11. [NAME] is a mid terrace Victorian house. The accommodation comprises, three bedrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen and bathroom. The house has an EPC Rating of C which is above average, and it is stated in the EPC report the floor area is 79m2. Outside: [NAME] has brick elevations under a pitched and tiled roof. There is a rear garden and roadside parking. [NAME] is situated in an established residential area close to local amenities and [ADDRESS] station. Evidence 12. The parties have returned the Tribunal’s completed Rent Appeal Statement together with helpful photographs and floor plan. The landlord provided written submissions together with details of comparable evidence of rental values in the area. The Tenant.

13. In the written evidence the Tenant made the following comments: a) The tenant considers a realistic rent increase would be between £1500- £2000 pcm b) The photographic evidence shows significant mould and damp to the internal walls of [NAME] c) The tenant states there have been continuing problems with pests d) There is damage to the wall plaster e) [NAME] is cold and difficult to heat.

4 f) [NAME] has been subject to enforcement action by the local authority who in the past have served the landlord with improvement notices with [NAME]. The Landlord.

14. The Landlord made the following comment: a) The landlord states that the condition of [NAME] is due to the tenant’s life style and the tenant does maintain a reasonable standard of cleanliness. b) There are no damp and pest issues. c) The landlord provided addresses of 2 recently let properties in the general area, setting out a rental valuation range of £2,500-£2,550 per month. However, the Tribunal can only place very limited weight on these as no details were supplied. Determination and Valuation 15. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Tottenham area together with the comparable evidence provided by the landlord, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good condition would be in the order of £2,400 per month. This is the rent we would expect [NAME] to let for in the open market including having white goods and curtains provided by the landlord.

16. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following: a) The dated kitchen and bathroom fittings. b) The general condition of [NAME] based upon the photographic evidence provided by the tenant. c) Electrical issues raised by the local authority 17. The Tribunal has considered very carefully this information and usings its own expertise considers that a deduction of £450 should be applied in order to take account of the of the above matters. It should be noted that this figure cannot be. a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.

5 The full valuation is shown below: Starting Rent £2,400 Less Items given under a)-c) above £450 Market rent £1,950 pcm Undue hardship 18. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.

19. The tenant has stated that there are 6 people occupy [NAME] with limited income and the rental payments are supplemented by Universal Credit. Ultimately, any increase in rent would cause undue hardship. On the basis of the evidence supplied by the Tenant and the level of the increase, the Tribunal considers that this will not cause undue hardship and accordingly sets the starting date for the new rent as 23 February 2026. Decision 18. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £1,950 per calendar month with effect from the 23 February 2026, being the date of the Landlord’s notice. APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal

6 Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal used its own expert knowledge of local rental values and comparable properties to set a starting market rent.
  • The Tribunal reduced the rent due to the dated kitchen and bathroom fittings.
  • The general condition of the property, as shown in the tenant's photographs, led to a rent reduction.
  • Electrical issues previously raised by the local authority contributed to a lower rent determination.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's argument that the property's condition was due to the tenant's lifestyle was not accepted.
  • The landlord's claim that there were no damp and pest issues was not accepted.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal determined that the market rent for an assured tenancy should be £1,950 pcm.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rent determination.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal considered evidence on property condition and local rental prices to set the new rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied in determining the market rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and comparable rental values in the area were key arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was partially in favour of the tenant, setting a lower rent than proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a significant rent increase can seek a fair market valuation through the First-tier Tribunal.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographic evidence of property condition and comparable rental values were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Either party may appeal to the Upper Tribunal on points of law within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.