VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the weekly rent at £127.00, effective from December 2, 2024.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar periodic tenancy in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The decision took effect on 2 December 2024, setting the weekly rent at £127.00 excluding certain charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First Tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00FC/MNR/2024/0712

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises

The Tribunal members were Flat 1 (First Floor) Rear of 22 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

c/o [APPELLANT] [COMPANY]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £127.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3 & 4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 2 December 2024

3. The amount included for services I not applicable

Per

4. Date periodic/statutory periodic assured tenancy commenced September 1995

5. Rental period Weekly (fortnightly by convention)

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per S11 Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

None

8. Description of premises

First floor flat 3 rooms plus kitchen and bathroom

Chairman [NAME] of Decision 6 May 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988 but the case was dismissed for other reasons.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

They used the Housing Act 1988 to determine a fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14.

What was the argument that mattered most?

Ensuring a fair rent determination under the Housing Act.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

For the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a fair rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Details of the tenancy and relevant legislation.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it's recommended to get legal advice for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.