VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The monthly rent was fixed at £1125.00, effective from 28th September 2024. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar tenancy in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The decision took effect on 28th September 2024, setting the monthly rent at £1125.00 excluding water rates and council tax.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00BN/MNR/2024/0664 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 26 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tribunal Judge Falder Tribunal Member Hossain Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT]/[COMPANY] 145 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is:£ 1125.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28th September 2024 3. The amount included for services is not applicable Per 4. Date assured tenancy commenced 28 September 2023 5. Length of the term or rental period Periodic 6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Integrated appliances provided by Landlord.

8. Description of premises Modern semi-detached property built in 2018 comprising hall, downstairs WC, living room, kitchen diner with integrated appliances. First floor comprising 3 bedrooms and a bath/WC. Front and rear gardens. UPVC windows throughout. Gas central heating. Chairman Tribunal Judge Falder Date of Decision 23rd April 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed11 cases
Other1 case

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant disputes the rent with the landlord.
  • The rent needs to be assessed and set by the First-tier Tribunal.
  • There is a need for a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.
  • The rent should be set at a reasonable level based on the open market value.
  • The tenant is entitled to a register of rents under an assured periodic tenancy.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1125.00.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988 to ensure a fair rent determination.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

Ensuring a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988 was the central argument.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should seek a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tenancy agreement and relevant statutory provisions were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to consult a solicitor for legal advice on such matters.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.