VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £1567.50, excluding water rates and council tax, effective from 1st October 2022.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and the terms of the original tenancy, excluding certain factors like improvements made by the tenant.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The decision took effect on 1st October 2022, setting the monthly rent at £1567.50 excluding water rates and council tax.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AD/MNR/2022/0149

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 25 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[RESPONDENT] [NAME] 0079475

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 160 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1567.50 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1st October 2022

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable Nil Per Month

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced

01/11/2016

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with Agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Washing Machine, Dishwasher, Cooker

9. Description of premises A semi detached property that offers Lounge, Kitchen, WC, 3 bedrooms and bathroom/WC. There is no vehicular access to the dwelling.

[NAME] of Decision 13 December 2022

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined by a tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 if they dispute it with their landlord.
  • A tenant is entitled to a rent determination based on current market conditions in the area.
  • A tenant is entitled to a rent determination under an assured periodic tenancy as per the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant is entitled to a rent assessment that reflects the property's condition and market comparables under an assured periodic tenancy.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • A landlord is entitled to determine the rent for an assured periodic tenancy in accordance with Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1567.50, excluding water rates and council tax.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the rent determination process.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, ensuring a fair rent determination.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the fair determination of rent under the Housing Act 1988.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, likely the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should seek a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as the tenancy agreement and relevant financial records were likely considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.