VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The rent was set at £575 per month, excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts specified in the judgment.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have the rent for their assured periodic tenancy determined by the Tribunal.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent has already been determined under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar periodic tenancy in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The decision took effect on 01 January 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/37UD/MNR/2022/0102

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 18 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 130 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £575.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 January 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable ---------- Per ----------

4. Date assured tenancy commenced Not Known

6. Length of the term or rental period Periodic

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per Landlord and Tenant Act

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord The Tribunal has not inspected the property. NONE

8. Description of premises A self contained second floor flat comprising lounge/dinning/kitchen, double bedroom, bathroom. Double glazing. Electric heating. Single garage.

[NAME] of Decision 24/03/2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant holds an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The rent determination request is made to the Tribunal.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No factors identified as all cases favored the claimant.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £575 per month.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which allows the Tribunal to determine the rent for assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) to determine their rent if they are in an assured periodic tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the tenancy agreement and the current rent were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.