VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £2,400 per month, excluding certain costs like water rates and council tax. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have the rent for their assured periodic tenancy determined by the tribunal.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy, except for a relevant low-cost tenancy, to apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting the rent at £2,400 per calendar month, excluding water rates and council tax but including service charges. The decision took effect on 10 January 2022.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AG/MNR/2022/0009

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 25 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 2,400 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 10 January 2022

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable nil Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included n/a

5. Date assured tenancy commenced December 2006

6. Length of the term or rental period Periodic monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Per tenancy

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord nil

9. Description of premises Mid terraced Edwardian House of traditional construction on 3 levels plus cellar. 6 rooms bath/wc kitchen.cellar and small store room Tenant has carried out significant improvements over the years. Disrepair to Property arising from house at No.23.

[NAME] of Decision 20 July 2022

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant has an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The tenant requests the rent be determined by the tribunal.
  • The tribunal has the authority to determine the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No significant factors identified as all cases favored the tenant.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £2,400 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which allows for rent determination for assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a tribunal decision to determine their rent under an assured periodic tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as the tenancy agreement and relevant financial records likely mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can typically be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.