VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal has set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The monthly rent is £525, excluding water rates and council tax but including any specified amounts. The decision became effective on 9 November 2019.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have the rent for their assured periodic tenancy determined by the Tribunal.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy, except for a relevant low-cost tenancy, to apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting the monthly rent at £525, excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts specified in the judgment. The decision took effect on 9 November 2019.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CM/MNR/2019/0081

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT]

Landlord Mrs [RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS], Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] & Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £525.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 9 November 2019

3. The amount included for services is: Not applicable

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 9 April 2018

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per Section 11 Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Not applicable

8. Description of premises 3 Bedroom Semi-Detached House, with Conservatory at rear. Gas radiator central heating, double glazed

[NAME] of Decision 21 January 2020

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant holds an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The rent determination is sought through the appropriate tribunal.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £525 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which allows the Tribunal to determine the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a rent determination through the Tribunal if they are in an assured periodic tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the tenancy agreement and the relevant statutory provisions were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.