
Benefits & Social Security judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Social Security Tribunal denied a claimant's request to appeal an overpayment decision, stating that the appeal lacked a reasonable chance of success. The claimant argued that he was laid off, not voluntarily quitting, but the tribunal found this irrelevant to the original decision regarding the time extension request.
In this case, the Social Security Tribunal of Canada refused to allow the claimant to proceed with an appeal against a previous decision about a person (EI) benefits. The tribunal determined that the claimant did not have a strong enough argument to warrant further review.
The Social Security Tribunal allowed more time for the claimant to file an appeal but ultimately denied the appeal because it lacked merit. The tribunal considered the claimant's personal issues as a reasonable explanation for the delay but found no substantial grounds for the appeal.
A person's appeal to receive Employment Insurance (a person) benefits was denied because they were living abroad and did not make reasonable efforts to find work while out of the country. The decision highlights that being outside Canada disqualifies one from receiving a person unless specific exceptions apply, and claimants must prove active job search efforts.
A person who lost their job because of misconduct was not allowed to appeal a decision denying them Employment Insurance (a person) benefits. The Social Security Tribunal found that the claimant did not have a strong enough case to proceed with an appeal, as the General Division's decision followed established law and evidence.
The Social Security Tribunal denied the claimant's request for an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal. The claimant argued that he had submitted an application within the 90-day deadline, but the Tribunal found that he did not provide a reasonable explanation for the delay.
The claimant, who applied for a person (a person) survivor and death benefits after their partner's passing, requested an extension of time to appeal a denial. The Social Security Tribunal refused this request because the original application was sent to the wrong address and did not provide new evidence or specific errors in the initial decision.
A person who quit their job and later applied for Employment Insurance benefits but delayed applying due to mental health issues had their appeal denied by the Social Security Tribunal. The tribunal found that the claimant did not show sufficient reason for the delay, preventing antedating of her claim.
The Social Security Tribunal denied the claimant's request to appeal her Employment Insurance benefit delay, stating that she did not provide enough evidence to prove she had a valid reason for the delay.
A person seeking to challenge an Employment Insurance (EI) decision must first get permission from the Social Security Tribunal. In this case, the Tribunal refused to grant permission because the claimant did not show any significant procedural or legal issues with the initial decision.
A person who missed the deadline to appeal a decision about Employment Insurance benefits asked for more time, but was refused because they couldn't explain why their application was late.
A person who made false statements about their employment status while receiving Employment Insurance (a person) benefits was denied permission to appeal a decision imposing a $4,000 penalty. The Social Security Tribunal of Canada determined that there were no reasonable grounds for reconsideration.
The Social Security Tribunal denied a worker's appeal for Employment Insurance benefits. The worker claimed he was eligible due to incorrect information from government employees. However, the Tribunal ruled that the law requires a complete cessation of work and pay for at least seven days, which the worker did not meet.