
Benefits & Social Security judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Social Security Tribunal refused to allow a worker's appeal against a decision that they were disqualified from Employment Insurance (EI) benefits because they left their job voluntarily without just cause. The tribunal found no evidence suggesting the original decision was wrong in law or fact.
The Appeal Division found that the General Division made a legal error by not considering whether the claimant knowingly failed to report her earnings while receiving benefits. As a result, the penalty was reduced.
In this case, the Appeal Division allowed an appeal from a lower court decision regarding penalties and violations imposed on a person who did not report their income while receiving Employment Insurance (EI) benefits. The Appeal Division found that the lower court made a mistake by not considering whether the claimant knowingly failed to report her earnings.
The Appeal Division denied the claimant's request for permission to appeal, finding no arguable case that the General Division made a reviewable error in denying Employment Insurance benefits. The General Division concluded the claimant voluntarily left his job without just cause, and the Appeal Division upheld this decision.
A person who received Employment Insurance (EI) benefits appealed against a decision requiring them to repay those funds. They requested an extension of time to file their appeal but were denied because they could not show why the filing was late or that there was any error in the original decision.
A person seeking to challenge an overpayment decision related to their Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) benefits from the Social Security Tribunal of Canada had their request for appeal permission denied due to insufficient grounds and lack of new evidence.
The a person Security Tribunal dismissed the claimant's appeal for a a person (a person) disability pension. The tribunal determined that her earnings after May 2010 were too high to qualify as disabled under the a person, and she was capable of working regularly despite her medical conditions.
The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the Canada Revenue Agency's decision that denied a claimant's eligibility for CERB and CRB benefits because the claimant did not earn enough self-employment income.
In this Employment Insurance (EI) case, the Social Security Tribunal of Canada denied an employer's request for permission to join as a party. The tribunal ruled that the employer failed to show how its legal rights would be directly affected by the decision on the worker's EI benefits claim.
A retiree who applied for an Old Age Security pension had their benefits terminated due to spending time outside Canada. When they missed the deadline to appeal, they requested an extension but were denied by the Social Security Tribunal because they did not provide a reasonable explanation for being late.
A worker appealed a decision that disqualified them from receiving EI benefits because they refused to return to in-person work as required by their employer's policy. The Social Security Tribunal’s Appeal Division decided not to allow the appeal, stating there was no reasonable chance of success based on the evidence.
The Social Security Tribunal allowed the appeal because the General Division failed to request a ruling from the Canada Revenue Agency on the claimant's insurable earnings, as mandated by law.