
General & Other judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
In a recent ruling, the Civil Resolution Tribunal decided that a client must pay their lawyer's invoice for legal services. The tribunal found that the client had agreed to the services and therefore was required to pay the invoice amount of $983.50.
In a small claims case, the claimant sought damages for extra fees, mental and emotional distress, and time spent on a dispute involving a tow service. The tribunal awarded partial reimbursement for the extra fees but dismissed the other claims, finding the claimant did not provide sufficient evidence for distress or time spent.
The Civil Resolution Tribunal dismissed a claimant's claims for emotional and reputational harm, and for the return of gifted earrings, due to insufficient evidence provided by the claimant.
In a recent case, the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board decided that an employer can still object to the untimeliness of a grievance even if the final-level decision is made late, as long as the employer has objected at earlier levels and within 30 days of being notified.
In this case, the Canada Industrial Relations Board certified a trade union as the bargaining agent for a specific group of workers. The board made this decision after finding that the union represented a majority of the employees in the proposed unit.
A tenant successfully recovered costs for repairing her bathroom after water leaked from a neighboring unit. However, she was unable to receive compensation for mental distress due to insufficient evidence.
A worker sued their employer's payroll administrator for unpaid wages, but the court ruled the payroll administrator was not liable since they were not part of the original employment agreement.
In this small claims case, the claimant sought payment from the respondent for a custom window contract. The tribunal ruled the contract was valid and enforceable, despite the respondent's arguments that it lacked explicit cancellation rights and a specific supply date. The claimant was awarded $805.27 plus interest and CRT fees.
The Civil Resolution Tribunal dismissed the applicant's claim for an accident responsibility determination as moot after the respondent changed its responsibility finding. The applicant was a minor at the time of the accident.
The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the dismissal of a claim brought by a person alleging harm caused by second-generation effects of residential school abuse. The court ruled that the claim was barred by the comprehensive release in the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement (IRSSA).
The Supreme Court of Canada decided that police violated a person's privacy rights by opening a truck door without permission or a warrant during an investigation of suspected impaired driving. The court ruled that the police actions went beyond the limits of an implied licence, which allows officers to approach a property for communication purposes.
A mechanic claimed that a repair shop's work on his truck was negligent. However, he could not provide expert evidence to support his claim, resulting in the dismissal of his case.