
General & Other judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
A worker was fired for using racial slurs at work. The court ruled that this behavior was severe enough to warrant immediate dismissal without notice or pay in lieu, according to the Labour Standards Code.
The Civil Resolution Tribunal dismissed a claim for vehicle repair costs because the claimant did not provide enough evidence to support her case. The decision emphasizes the need for proper documentation in insurance claims.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision by a Final Level Adjudicator (FLA) in a grievance system. The applicant claimed that the FLA's decision was procedurally unfair and biased. The court found the FLA's decision to be reasonable and fair.
A service provider successfully recovered unpaid invoices from a client in a BC Small Claims case. The Tribunal ruled in favour of the service provider, ordering the client to pay the full amount owed, including interest and fees.
The Environmental Appeals Board dismissed an appeal filed by the claimant due to untimely filing. The claimant tried to extend the deadline but did not provide enough proof of extenuating circumstances.
The claimant loaned her car to the respondent, who returned it without a bedroll. The claimant successfully recovered partial damages for the lost bedroll but failed to recover costs for an air filter and deodorizer.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review challenging a disciplinary decision. The court found that the claimant failed to follow proper procedures and awarded costs to the respondents.
In a minor collision in a parking lot, the Civil Resolution Tribunal found both drivers equally responsible. The claimant was awarded partial damages for overpaying their insurance deductible.
The claimant ordered stone for her home's exterior and claimed the delivered stone was the wrong color. However, the tribunal ruled that the claimant did not provide enough proof that the stone was incorrect, resulting in a decision in favour of the respondent for payment of the stone and delivery charges.
The Federal Court granted permission to submit additional evidence and overturned the Board's decision, allowing the registration of a trademark. The court ruled that the trademark's features were not primarily dictated by a utilitarian function, making it eligible for registration.
In a recent case, a borrower claimed that a lender's unauthorized credit inquiries caused him to pay a higher interest rate on a car loan. However, the Civil Resolution Tribunal dismissed the claim because the borrower could not provide enough proof that the credit inquiries affected his credit score.