
Immigration & Refugee judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Federal Court dismissed a refugee protection claim in 2026, upholding the decision of the Refugee Appeal Division. The court found that the claimant's evidence lacked credibility and procedural fairness was maintained throughout the process.
The Federal Court granted judicial review of the Refugee Appeal Division's decision, finding it unreasonable due to an analytical gap in its reasoning regarding the applicant's safety in relocation to Biratnagar.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review, upholding an officer's decision that rejected a permanent residency application due to a lack of genuine employment offer. The officer found that the employment offer was not genuine because no specific reasons were given for why a 16.5-year-old youth required full-time care.
The Federal Court dismissed a challenge to a negative decision by the Refugee Protection Division regarding refugee status. The Court ruled that the claimant did not prove the decision was unreasonable.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review of a decision denying refugee status. The court concluded that the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to support his claims of persecution and that the decision respected procedural fairness.
The Federal Court rejected an appeal challenging an immigration officer's decision to deny a humanitarian and compassionate application. The court found that the officer's decision was reasonable based on the evidence presented and the relevant legal standards.
The Federal Court found the RAD's decision unreasonable for failing to properly consider evidence of persecution risk. The Court noted that the RAD did not adequately address the links between the claimant's experiences and those of her family members, nor did it fully consider the evidence regarding the motivations of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel to persecute the claimant and her family in Mérida.
The Federal Court granted an application for judicial review, setting aside decisions regarding work permit refusals and remitting the matter for redetermination by a different decision-maker. The court found the decisions unreasonable and lacking justification.