
Immigration & Refugee judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
In an immigration case, the Federal Court rejected a motion for reconsideration filed by the claimant. The court ruled that Rule 397 of the Federal Courts Rules does not apply to the claimant's arguments.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review application, upholding the decision that the claimant's refugee claim was manifestly unfounded due to lack of credible evidence and inconsistencies in testimony and documents.
The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review, upholding a decision that a claimant was inadmissible for misrepresentation under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. The court ruled that the claimant's argument of an innocent mistake exception did not apply.
The Federal Court ruled that an officer's decision to deny a visa application was invalid because the officer did not provide enough detail on how the omission of previous visa refusals could affect the administration of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
The Federal Court overturned a visa officer's decision because the officer made a mistake in interpreting the applicant's family ties. The court found that the officer's decision was based on an incorrect understanding of the evidence.
The Federal Court granted a judicial review of an immigration application due to the Officer's flawed reasoning and lack of justification. The Court found that the Officer's decision lacked transparency, intelligibility, and justification, failing to properly evaluate the evidence presented.
The Federal Court overturned a decision by a visa officer to deny a temporary resident visa to an individual. The court found the officer's reasoning insufficiently justified, particularly regarding the applicant's family ties outside Canada.
In an immigration case, the Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review because the applicant did not follow the Court's protocol and failed to prove a solicitor-client relationship.