
Immigration & Refugee judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Federal Court upheld the refusal of a Post-Graduate Work Permit due to non-compliance with a procedural fairness request. The applicant failed to provide a requested document, leading to the refusal of the permit.
The Federal Court dismissed a judicial review of a humanitarian and compassionate application because the claimant did not provide credible evidence to support his sexual orientation and the hardship he would face if returned to Nigeria.
The Federal Court granted a judicial review, overturning an Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada officer's decision to deny a study permit application. The officer's refusal was based on procedural fairness issues, as the officer made credibility findings without allowing the applicant to respond.
The Federal Court overturned decisions refusing applications for permanent residence because the Officer ignored evidence provided by the applicants in response to a procedural fairness letter.
The Federal Court overturned a visa officer's decision to refuse a spousal open work permit. The officer claimed there wasn't enough proof of the spouse's employment status. However, the Court found that the applicant had provided ample evidence, including a work permit, LMIA, and pay stubs, proving their spouse's employment in a high-skilled position.
The Federal Court rejected a work permit application because the applicant did not provide enough proof of their language skills. The Court ruled that the applicant needed to show clear evidence of meeting the language requirements set by the Labour Market Impact Assessment.
The Federal Court dismissed the application for judicial review, confirming that the marriage was not genuine and was entered primarily for immigration purposes, according to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations.